mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
	"Takahiro Kuwano" <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
	"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	haibo.chen@oss.nxp.com
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, michael@walle.cc,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Haibo Chen" <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: clear the default RDCR opcode when entering Octal DTR
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:59:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929065924.C12141F00898@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929-spi-nor-fix-v2-1-75440cfe4e76@nxp.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mtd: spi-nor: compilation error accessing non-existent opcodes.read_sr2
- [High] mtd: spi-nor: modifying hallucinated opcode does not skip SR2 reads
- [Medium] mtd: spi-nor: permanent breakage of SR2 reads due to missing state restore
--

commit b3ebcb1264c5eaab828caba13b5a6ee56af80aa5
Author: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>

mtd: spi-nor: clear the default RDCR opcode when entering Octal DTR

This commit attempts to skip invalid SR2 reads when switching to Octal DTR
mode by clearing a default RDCR opcode. It updates spi_nor_set_octal_dtr()
to clear read_sr2 on success.

> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 8bc117b46e028..0f47d869cbb48 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -3238,10 +3238,16 @@ static int spi_nor_set_octal_dtr(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	if (enable)
> +	if (enable) {
>  		nor->reg_proto = SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR;
> -	else
> +		/*
> +		 * The default RDCR is not a valid SR2 read in Octal DTR mode;
> +		 * clear it so SR2 reads are skipped instead of being issued.
> +		 */
> +		nor->params->opcodes.read_sr2 = 0;

[Severity: High]
Can this code compile successfully? struct spi_nor_flash_parameter (which
nor->params points to) does not appear to contain an opcodes field, which
would cause a build failure here.

[Severity: High]
If this dynamic opcode field did exist, would modifying it actually prevent
the SR2 reads?

Looking at spi_nor_read_sr2(), it seems the reads rely entirely on statically
hardcoded macros rather than dynamic configuration fields:

drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c:spi_nor_read_sr2() {
    ...
	if (nor->spimem) {
		struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_NOR_RDSR2_OP(sr2);
    ...
	} else {
		ret = spi_nor_controller_ops_read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_RDSR2, sr2,
						      1);
	}
    ...
}

Since SPI_NOR_RDSR2_OP and SPINOR_OP_RDSR2 are static constants, wouldn't
the reads still be issued regardless of this variable's state?

> +	} else {
>  		nor->reg_proto = SNOR_PROTO_1_1_1;
> +	}

[Severity: Medium]
When disabling Octal DTR, does this path also need to restore the cleared
opcode state?

If the opcode was zeroed when enabling the mode, dropping back to
SNOR_PROTO_1_1_1 without restoring it might leave SR2 reads permanently
disabled for the remaining lifetime of the device.

>  	return 0;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260929-spi-nor-fix-v2-1-75440cfe4e76@nxp.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29  6:53 haibo.chen
2026-09-29  6:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-29  7:28   ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29  8:23 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29  9:10   ` Bough Chen (OSS)
2026-09-29 14:02   ` Michael Walle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260929065924.C12141F00898@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=haibo.chen@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®