mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: jim.cromie@gmail.com
Cc: Jim Cromie via B4 Relay <devnull+jim.cromie.gmail.com@kernel.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] kallsyms: Accelerate symbol name lookups by ~7x
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:45:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929114554.571ba4899639db50f71fafa5@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929-ksyms-tune-v7-0-be568ceef41e@gmail.com>

On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 12:07:29 -0600 Jim Cromie via B4 Relay <devnull+jim.cromie.gmail.com@kernel.org> wrote:

> In 2022, commit 60443c88f3a8 ("kallsyms: Improve the performance of
> kallsyms_lookup_name()") introduced kallsyms_seqs_of_names[] (+550 KiB
> .rodata), transforming an O(N) linear scan into an O(log N) binary
> search (5.2 ms -> ~7.2 us).  While this was a major step forward,
> the binary search inner loop was left decompressing full candidate
> names and scanning across sparse 256:1 markers on every probe.
> 
> Modern fleet observability, security daemons (e.g. CrowdStrike Falcon,
> Cilium, Datadog, Falco), and tracing tools resolve thousands of kernel
> functions by name at boot or service start.
> 
> CrowdStrike recently hit this in production:
> 
> commit 93e8fd1a565e ("ftrace: Use kallsyms binary search for single-symbol lookup")
> 
> Attaching just 50 kprobe.session programs caused an 858 ms attach
> stall with 25% CPU burned in kallsyms.  That commit routed single-symbol
> libbpf attach directly to kallsyms_lookup_name().  In larger workloads
> (such as the BPF selftest serial_test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach across
> 64,000 symbols), kallsyms_lookup_names() spends ~390 ms in raw CPU spin.
> 
> This series accelerates kallsyms_lookup_names() by 7.0x (from 6,102 ns
> down to 866 ns per lookup), cutting 64k-symbol attach from ~390 ms to
> ~55 ms, by fixing two inner-loop bottlenecks:

Thanks, this is awesome.

> 0. Candidate symbols are fully decompressed into a 512-byte stack buffer
>    before calling strcmp(), even though ~16 of the 17 search steps
>    mismatch at the first differing character (0..N-1, heavily
>    front-loaded toward 0-2).
> 
> 1. Probes scan sequentially from 256:1 markers in kallsyms_names[],
>    decoding an average of 127.5 symbols per probe (~2,170 hops across a
>    17-step search).
> 
> The 3-patch progression:
> 
> 0. Patch 1 introduces kallsyms_strcmp_symbol() to compare ASCII queries
>    against compressed tokens on the fly, bailing out on first mismatch.
>    Drops the 512-byte stack buffer and saves ~530 ns.
> 
> 1. Patch 2 increases marker density from 256:1 to 16:1, cutting average
>    scan distance from 127.5 to 7.5 hops and dropping lookup latency from
>    6,102 ns to 866 ns for +42.2 KiB of .rodata.
> 
> 2. Patch 3 inlines and unrolls get_symbol_seq() 24-bit reconstruction.
> 
> Results (CONFIG_KALLSYMS_SELFTEST across ~184k symbols):
> - Baseline (256:1):  6,102 ns
> - Patch 1 (strcmp):  5,572 ns (-530 ns)
> - Patch 2 (16:1):      866 ns (7.0x faster)
> 
> Trade-offs:
> - .rodata footprint: +42.2 KiB (+10,782 u32 entries for ~184k symbols,
>   ~0.1% of loaded kernel image).

That's the bad news.  Can anything be done to reduce this aspect?

> ---
> Jim Cromie (3):
>       kallsyms: Match compressed tokens on the fly during binary search
>       kallsyms: Increase marker density to 16:1 to accelerate lookups
>       kallsyms: Unroll 24-bit sequence reconstruction in get_symbol_seq()

I'll queue this in mm.git for testing, would prefer not to go further
without third-party review, please.



      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29 18:07 Jim Cromie via B4 Relay
2026-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] kallsyms: Match compressed tokens on the fly during binary search Jim Cromie via B4 Relay
2026-09-30  1:17   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-30  6:26   ` Kees Cook
2026-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] kallsyms: Increase marker density to 16:1 to accelerate lookups Jim Cromie via B4 Relay
2026-09-30  6:28   ` Kees Cook
2026-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] kallsyms: Unroll 24-bit sequence reconstruction in get_symbol_seq() Jim Cromie via B4 Relay
2026-09-30  6:56   ` Kees Cook
2026-09-30  9:13     ` David Laight
2026-09-29 18:45 ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260929114554.571ba4899639db50f71fafa5@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=devnull+jim.cromie.gmail.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®