From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CC5D35C694; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 01:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790733579; cv=none; b=lz0jxCtqs4kqnkuDg+qIyR+JUZWXGJwXNmWyrpYRfvLFSo2xtcZirOkMk/a4FZPgQS9zUaEo6TF2MD6F/F4ab0Jwx8ojZVkbA8t4KqEWNR2hiJU0s/c9+mMJ2ZMNQT3r6zRPEC5J45IOEZobN213QkcvR1f2QtxC0MH8ptWKD+Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790733579; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KFGeCKbg4CYXwolsSNFD4SjR0QSQDZ4XOsA3L5iCQR4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PQFxyXEgoebtmy6hyh+udj06i/jVLQhWNp/YYWSIqFNS/uzenTCPhz4XFb7ANfLnxQ6RHgevcxFSkODG8dpZEVIAyuU6Ow6GTW8CU7nSq36IO5lyVwUefja+BlxlfCEbXMGJUgogxeMR+D14cO4EA61qvsV42icxLeSVKouLBfc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=REtHWVNL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="REtHWVNL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 031D21F000FF; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 01:59:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790733577; bh=0vLjdzZVo2qjctqqDpE5Ro7QbiQoISQRnLovdDe46Yk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=REtHWVNLtp5xQUCYPa1SNv2wi1HPGDYr4bMdLX8DmmFWKRvTZO94mb+fuKwphevzm BbuXAJo2x+BIfNeo+Mdhaa5263nz4Dae5Do+Q2P/a6KIGP6sBRc43sSthi2fu7/ES6 z1/1j6h1vUR1BRTIziw6vk0cQlhEMApW148dwC/60GAuofVdgWwGNjpH9vrgppHIH7 hNwkBH3uNN1S21RVOt4Mg35BzoN2ExDC0FRWHRoopz7DDuMMq5T155eVYmpGkjmsxT dfxwW1uh3ubmIEZreQOlSP2EqGECgSqR42LCqVAUiwMr/d0MMqEhhTnzM6bT5TTywK lWU7k4swLgxpQ== Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:59:36 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Quentin Freimanis Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Steen Hegelund , Daniel Machon , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Lars Povlsen , Bjarni Jonasson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sparx5: make ports inherit the switch base mac address type Message-ID: <20260929185936.687250f9@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260928045012.30178-1-quentin@q-lab.dev> References: <20260928045012.30178-1-quentin@q-lab.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 27 Sep 2026 21:50:12 -0700 Quentin Freimanis wrote: > 0 is NET_ADDR_PERM, so userspace thinks this is a stable address. Could you please explain the end-user impact of this? Unclear to me from the commit msg if this is something that broke your deployment / scripts or maybe you simply noticed it from code inspection / LLM scan. No need to repost, just explain, I'll add it when applying. > Fix by tracking the base MAC address assign type in the sparx5 struct > and applying it to each port's netdev. Generally no need to repeat what an average reader can easily grok from the diff.