From: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, criu@lists.linux.dev,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@mihalicyn.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/x86: Check restoring FPU state with larger xstate_size
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:26:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929232621.3745312-3-avagin@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929232621.3745312-1-avagin@google.com>
Extend sigframe_fpu_portability.c with two test cases for signal frames
whose xstate_size exceeds the current task's fpstate->user_size:
- test_valid_larger_xstate_size(): Verifies that the kernel restores FPU
state from a signal frame with a larger xstate_size and an unsupported
feature bit in _fpx_sw_bytes.xfeatures when the XSAVE header
(XSTATE_BV) only contains supported features. This emulates migrating
a process from a newer CPU to an older CPU when the process has not
used any unsupported features.
- test_invalid_larger_xstate_size(): Verifies that the kernel rejects
(via SIGSEGV) a signal frame with a larger xstate_size when the XSAVE
header (XSTATE_BV) marks an unsupported feature as active.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>
---
.../selftests/x86/sigframe_fpu_portability.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigframe_fpu_portability.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigframe_fpu_portability.c
index 8377de052032..afa9e6eab9b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigframe_fpu_portability.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigframe_fpu_portability.c
@@ -30,6 +30,14 @@
* - test_invalid_shrunk_xstate_size:
* Verifies that the kernel rejects a frame if xstate_size is too small for
* the features enabled in xfeatures.
+ *
+ * - test_valid_larger_xstate_size:
+ * Verifies that the kernel restores state from a frame with xstate_size
+ * larger than the current task's size, if no unsupported features are active.
+ *
+ * - test_invalid_larger_xstate_size:
+ * Verifies that the kernel rejects a frame with a larger xstate_size if it
+ * contains unsupported features in the xsave header.
*/
#define SIGFRAME_XSTATE_HDR_OFFSET 512
@@ -160,12 +168,13 @@ static void handle_invalid_shrunk_xstate_size(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ucp)
__handle_shrunk_xstate_size(sig, si, ucp, false);
}
-static void test_valid_shrunk_xstate_size(void)
+static void run_valid_sigframe_test(void (*handler)(int, siginfo_t *, void *),
+ const char *desc)
{
uint64_t v[4];
sig_err_buf[0] = 0;
- sethandler(SIGUSR1, handle_valid_shrunk_xstate_size, 0);
+ sethandler(SIGUSR1, handler, 0);
v[0] = 0x1111111111111111ULL;
v[1] = 0x2222222222222222ULL;
@@ -176,7 +185,7 @@ static void test_valid_shrunk_xstate_size(void)
if (sig_err_buf[0])
ksft_test_result_fail("%s\n", sig_err_buf);
else if (v[2] == TEST_YMMH_VAL && v[3] == (TEST_YMMH_VAL + 1))
- ksft_test_result_pass("YMM state restored correctly from shrunk frame\n");
+ ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", desc);
else
ksft_test_result_fail(
"Got upper bits: 0x%lx 0x%lx (expected %lx %lx)\n",
@@ -192,12 +201,13 @@ static void handle_segv(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ucp)
siglongjmp(segv_jmpbuf, 1);
}
-static void test_invalid_shrunk_xstate_size(void)
+static void run_invalid_sigframe_test(void (*handler)(int, siginfo_t *, void *),
+ const char *desc)
{
uint64_t v[4];
sig_err_buf[0] = 0;
- sethandler(SIGUSR1, handle_invalid_shrunk_xstate_size, 0);
+ sethandler(SIGUSR1, handler, 0);
sethandler(SIGSEGV, handle_segv, 0);
if (sigsetjmp(segv_jmpbuf, 1) == 0) {
@@ -206,7 +216,7 @@ static void test_invalid_shrunk_xstate_size(void)
v[2] = 0x3333333333333333ULL;
v[3] = 0x4444444444444444ULL;
raise_with_ymm0(SIGUSR1, v);
- sig_print("Inconsistent size was NOT rejected\n");
+ sig_print("Invalid frame was NOT rejected\n");
}
clearhandler(SIGUSR1);
@@ -215,13 +225,103 @@ static void test_invalid_shrunk_xstate_size(void)
if (sig_err_buf[0])
ksft_test_result_fail("%s\n", sig_err_buf);
else
- ksft_test_result_pass("Inconsistent size correctly rejected\n");
+ ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", desc);
+}
+
+static void test_valid_shrunk_xstate_size(void)
+{
+ run_valid_sigframe_test(handle_valid_shrunk_xstate_size,
+ "YMM state restored correctly from shrunk frame");
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_shrunk_xstate_size(void)
+{
+ run_invalid_sigframe_test(handle_invalid_shrunk_xstate_size,
+ "Inconsistent shrunk xstate_size correctly rejected");
+}
+
+static char fpu_buffer[8192] __attribute__((aligned(64)));
+#define UNSUPPORTED_XFEATURE (1ULL << 62)
+
+static void __handle_larger_xstate_size(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ucp, bool valid_xfeatures)
+{
+ uint64_t *ymmh_p, xfeatures;
+ struct xsave_buffer *xbuf;
+ struct _fpx_sw_bytes *sw;
+ ucontext_t *uc = ucp;
+ size_t copy_size;
+ void *fp;
+
+ fp = uc->uc_mcontext.fpregs;
+ if (!fp) {
+ sig_print("fpregs is NULL\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ sw = get_fpx_sw_bytes(fp);
+ if (sw->magic1 != FP_XSTATE_MAGIC1) {
+ sig_print("magic1 is not valid\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ copy_size = sw->xstate_size;
+ if (copy_size + 64 + FP_XSTATE_MAGIC2_SIZE > sizeof(fpu_buffer)) {
+ sig_print("fpu_buffer is too small\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ memset(fpu_buffer, 0, sizeof(fpu_buffer));
+ memcpy(fpu_buffer, fp, copy_size);
+
+ xbuf = (struct xsave_buffer *)fpu_buffer;
+ sw = get_fpx_sw_bytes(fpu_buffer);
+
+ sw->xstate_size += 64;
+ sw->extended_size += 64;
+ xfeatures = get_fpx_sw_bytes_features(fpu_buffer);
+ set_fpx_sw_bytes_features(fpu_buffer, xfeatures | UNSUPPORTED_XFEATURE);
+
+ *(uint32_t *)(fpu_buffer + sw->xstate_size) = FP_XSTATE_MAGIC2;
+
+ if (!valid_xfeatures) {
+ xfeatures = get_xstatebv(xbuf);
+ set_xstatebv(xbuf, xfeatures | UNSUPPORTED_XFEATURE);
+ }
+
+ ymmh_p = (uint64_t *)(fpu_buffer + ymm_offset);
+ ymmh_p[0] = TEST_YMMH_VAL;
+ ymmh_p[1] = TEST_YMMH_VAL + 1;
+
+ /* Update fpregs to point to the new buffer */
+ uc->uc_mcontext.fpregs = (fpregset_t)fpu_buffer;
+}
+
+static void handle_valid_larger_xstate_size(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ucp)
+{
+ __handle_larger_xstate_size(sig, si, ucp, true);
+}
+
+static void handle_invalid_larger_xstate_size(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ucp)
+{
+ __handle_larger_xstate_size(sig, si, ucp, false);
+}
+
+static void test_valid_larger_xstate_size(void)
+{
+ run_valid_sigframe_test(handle_valid_larger_xstate_size,
+ "YMM state restored correctly from larger frame");
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_larger_xstate_size(void)
+{
+ run_invalid_sigframe_test(handle_invalid_larger_xstate_size,
+ "Unsupported feature in larger frame correctly rejected");
}
int main(void)
{
ksft_print_header();
- ksft_set_plan(2);
+ ksft_set_plan(4);
self_pid = getpid();
@@ -229,6 +329,8 @@ int main(void)
test_valid_shrunk_xstate_size();
test_invalid_shrunk_xstate_size();
+ test_valid_larger_xstate_size();
+ test_invalid_larger_xstate_size();
ksft_finished();
return 0;
--
2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 23:26 [PATCH 0/2] x86/fpu: Allow restoring signal frames " Andrei Vagin
2026-09-29 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Andrei Vagin
2026-09-29 23:26 ` Andrei Vagin [this message]
2026-09-29 23:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Borislav Petkov
2026-09-30 0:02 ` Andrei Vagin
2026-09-30 2:51 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929232621.3745312-3-avagin@google.com \
--to=avagin@google.com \
--cc=alexander@mihalicyn.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=criu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®