From: Artem Dinaburg <artem@trailofbits.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Artem Dinaburg <artem@trailofbits.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
erezsh@mellanox.com
Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y] net/mlx5e: Fix netif state handling
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:21:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930012143.95721-1-artem@trailofbits.com> (raw)
From: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
[ Upstream commit 3d5918477f94e4c2f064567875c475468e264644 ]
mlx5e_suspend cleans resources only if netif_device_present() returns
true. However, mlx5e_resume changes the state of netif, via
mlx5e_nic_enable, only if reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED.
In the below case, the above leads to NULL-ptr Oops[1] and memory
leaks:
mlx5e_probe
_mlx5e_resume
mlx5e_attach_netdev
mlx5e_nic_enable <-- netdev not reg, not calling netif_device_attach()
register_netdev <-- failed for some reason.
ERROR_FLOW:
_mlx5e_suspend <-- netif_device_present return false, resources aren't freed :(
Hence, clean resources in this case as well.
[1]
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP
CPU: 2 PID: 9345 Comm: test-ovs-ct-gen Not tainted 6.5.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_09_05_16_01 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:0x0
Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at0xffffffffffffffd6.
RSP: 0018:ffff888178aaf758 EFLAGS: 00010246
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die+0x20/0x60
? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0
? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0
blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3d/0x60
mlx5_blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x30 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_core_uplink_netdev_event_replay+0x3e/0x60 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_mdev_netdev_track+0x53/0x60 [mlx5_ib]
mlx5_ib_roce_init+0xc3/0x340 [mlx5_ib]
__mlx5_ib_add+0x34/0xd0 [mlx5_ib]
mlx5r_probe+0xe1/0x210 [mlx5_ib]
? auxiliary_match_id+0x6a/0x90
auxiliary_bus_probe+0x38/0x80
? driver_sysfs_add+0x51/0x80
really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0
? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90
__driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160
driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90
__device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100
bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0
__device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0
bus_probe_device+0x86/0xa0
device_add+0x637/0x840
__auxiliary_device_add+0x3b/0xa0
add_adev+0xc9/0x140 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x22a/0x310 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_register_device+0x53/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x5c4/0x9c0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_init_one+0x3b/0x60 [mlx5_core]
probe_one+0x44c/0x730 [mlx5_core]
local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90
pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x210
? kernfs_create_link+0x5d/0xa0
? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x60/0xc0
really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0
? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90
__driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160
driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90
__device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100
bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0
__device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0
pci_bus_add_device+0x54/0x80
pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2e6/0x320
sriov_enable+0x208/0x420
mlx5_core_sriov_configure+0x9e/0x200 [mlx5_core]
sriov_numvfs_store+0xae/0x1a0
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0
vfs_write+0x291/0x3c0
ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
CR2: 0000000000000000
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[ Backport to 6.6.y: added an internal suspend helper so probe unwind
cleans resources without changing the registered-device suspend path. ]
Fixes: 2c3b5beec46a ("net/mlx5e: More generic netdev management API")
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240509112951.590184-2-tariqt@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Artem Dinaburg <artem@trailofbits.com>
---
Hi Greg, Sasha, and net maintainers,
I am working through the small CVE backports still missing from 6.6.y.
This one addresses CVE-2024-38608. It releases probe resources even when
register_netdev() failed before device-present state.
The fix is already present in 6.12.y, 6.18.y, and 7.2.y, but not in 6.6.y.
This fix also affects 6.1.y, which will need a separate backport; this
submission contains only the 6.6.y patch.
The target-specific adjustment is recorded in the bracketed note above.
Could you please queue it for 6.6.y?
CVE: CVE-2024-38608
Upstream: 3d5918477f94e4c2f064567875c475468e264644
AI assistance: An LLM helped identify, adapt, and validate this backport; I
reviewed the resulting code and validation evidence.
Thanks,
Artem Dinaburg
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
index 97fa2095498cc8..bfccdcd7928be0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -6018,14 +6018,15 @@ static int mlx5e_resume(struct auxiliary_device *adev)
return 0;
}
-static int mlx5e_suspend(struct auxiliary_device *adev, pm_message_t state)
+static int mlx5e_suspend_common(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
+ bool pre_netdev_reg)
{
struct mlx5e_dev *mlx5e_dev = auxiliary_get_drvdata(adev);
struct mlx5e_priv *priv = mlx5e_dev->priv;
struct net_device *netdev = priv->netdev;
struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev = priv->mdev;
- if (!netif_device_present(netdev)) {
+ if (!pre_netdev_reg && !netif_device_present(netdev)) {
if (test_bit(MLX5E_STATE_DESTROYING, &priv->state))
mlx5e_destroy_mdev_resources(mdev);
return -ENODEV;
@@ -6036,6 +6037,11 @@ static int mlx5e_suspend(struct auxiliary_device *adev, pm_message_t state)
return 0;
}
+static int mlx5e_suspend(struct auxiliary_device *adev, pm_message_t state)
+{
+ return mlx5e_suspend_common(adev, false);
+}
+
static int mlx5e_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
const struct auxiliary_device_id *id)
{
@@ -6044,7 +6050,6 @@ static int mlx5e_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev = edev->mdev;
struct mlx5e_dev *mlx5e_dev;
struct net_device *netdev;
- pm_message_t state = {};
struct mlx5e_priv *priv;
int err;
@@ -6107,7 +6112,7 @@ static int mlx5e_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
return 0;
err_resume:
- mlx5e_suspend(adev, state);
+ mlx5e_suspend_common(adev, true);
err_profile_cleanup:
profile->cleanup(priv);
err_destroy_netdev:
--
2.39.5
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 1:21 Artem Dinaburg [this message]
2026-09-30 1:23 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260930012143.95721-1-artem@trailofbits.com \
--to=artem@trailofbits.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=erezsh@mellanox.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®