From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>, Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>,
Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Update DENYLIST.riscv64
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 06:46:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930064607.1908864-5-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930064607.1908864-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Both probe_user and stacktrace_build_id fail on riscv64 due to riscv64's
trap-based kprobe handling.
For probe_user, kprobes on riscv64 are handled via traps where the entry
path invokes irqentry_nmi_enter(). Because bpf_probe_write_user()
rejects execution in NMI context, the test fails. Upstream discussions
regarding NMI semantics on riscv are ongoing [0] and will be tracked.
For stacktrace_build_id, under the kprobe trap context with interrupts
disabled, bpf_get_stackid() obtains a valid build_id, but the queued
irq_work is deferred. As a result, subsequent bpf_get_stack() fails to
acquire mmap_read_trylock() and falls back to BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP,
causing an inconsistency between the two results.
Since stacktrace_build_id is already included in the generic DENYLIST,
only add probe_user to DENYLIST.riscv64.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230702025708.784106-1-guoren@kernel.org [0]
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64 | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64
index ca1beae7fe8f..75a9690fb2f2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
# riscv64 deny list for BPF CI and local vmtest
exceptions # JIT does not support exceptions
+probe_user # kprobe hit in trap
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 6:46 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] riscv, bpf: Prepare for upcoming daily CI Pu Lehui
2026-09-30 6:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] bpf, riscv: Fix stack-passed arguments for indirect trampolines Pu Lehui
2026-09-30 6:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] selftests/bpf: Avoid jiffies quantization error in setget_sockopt Pu Lehui
2026-09-30 6:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] selftests/bpf: Update qemu config for riscv64 in vmtest.sh Pu Lehui
2026-09-30 7:19 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-30 8:18 ` Pu Lehui
2026-09-30 6:46 ` Pu Lehui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260930064607.1908864-5-pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
--to=pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®