From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@meta.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Mike Marciniszyn (Meta)" <mike.marciniszyn@gmail.com>,
Mohsin Bashir <mohsin.bashr@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>,
Dimitri Daskalakis <daskald@meta.com>,
Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>, Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] fbnic: Support larger RX pages
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:36:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930113619.GX13925@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925104417.2325213-1-bjorn@kernel.org>
On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 12:44:07PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This series adds support for large io_uring zero-copy RX buffers to
> fbnic.
>
> fbnic hardware consumes receive memory in 4 KiB device pages, while
> io_uring may expose a larger software buffer, such as 256 KiB. Track
> the device-page geometry per BDQ, represent each large buffer with
> consecutive descriptors, and decode completions to the corresponding
> offset within the buffer. HPQ keeps its existing PAGE_SIZE geometry.
>
> Larger buffers also reduce pressure on the memory provider. One
> provider allocation supplies multiple 4 KiB device pages, so the same
> amount of receive memory needs fewer net_iov objects and fewer
> allocation, refill, and recycle operations. Hardware descriptor use
> remains unchanged.
>
> Ring depth and buffer size must be validated together. An ethtool ring
> change can otherwise make an active memory-provider configuration
> invalid. Store RX ring depths in netdev_config, stage proposed values
> in cfg_pending, and validate the default and each RX queue before
> committing the change. Both netlink and ioctl use the same transaction
> helpers.
>
> The selftest requests a power-of-two buffer larger than twice the MTU,
> checks the reported buffer length, and verifies received data. It does
> not assume how packets are placed within the buffer.
>
> This series depends on the fbnic real-queue synchronization fix:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260924191817.1843726-1-bjorn@kernel.org/
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 10:44 Björn Töpel
2026-09-25 10:44 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/5] net: Add netdev_config helpers Björn Töpel
2026-09-30 16:44 ` Joe Damato
2026-09-25 10:44 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/5] fbnic: Track BDQ device-page geometry per ring Björn Töpel
2026-09-30 17:08 ` Joe Damato
2026-09-25 10:44 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/5] net: Revalidate queue config for ringparam changes Björn Töpel
2026-09-30 17:22 ` Joe Damato
2026-09-25 10:44 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] fbnic: Support larger memory-provider RX pages Björn Töpel
2026-09-25 10:44 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/5] selftests: drv-net: Request larger zcrx buffers Björn Töpel
2026-09-30 11:36 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-10-01 0:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] fbnic: Support larger RX pages patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260930113619.GX13925@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=daskald@meta.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn@gmail.com \
--cc=mohsin.bashr@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®