From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D640D47CA8D; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790808968; cv=none; b=pljuQAJBE1rdf4SccH0krEkCf8GJSlk1+YkaQqxOi9SEO2JsIZl+QvP+mATg+qHtrorGVsFsql0ugXH5NiYq5YitsNk3utgKC30qeTelfCH5cpuj0x+q3P/6oDtL/HQ5c8JJJBSbO5Us2Dliwe+HcC6wGHASzpTW6o5DbYBPeNY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790808968; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yb1aTZJBy950Ab7G7REhwM+t57XIvDPW1JXAWHDGtYQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qiC5rX6g875AB1x43zkJQ15WxeJZa085nR4cKd8XSMK+trEqtPufI6QlX+ODYOQfXK2uxHVYi4yNbzZrDxd3pUnNZHdrgOZizTd+VoCXZtfYBTTCONu6jVfswfDVjTgqs8wIB1+8cZV/Tc82UJuvjwfBkRiCYwsJsoa++j1oW5o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=BOsZNIYE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BOsZNIYE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18A1B1F000FF; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:56:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790808961; bh=qHHYqPRV+m8v2VUfLotNTzVtXMK4YB35bky+6A4Adok=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=BOsZNIYEYq+B3SiahprMOm7UpEKfeV5cc87jwH2t3qYsZ/W6tcqIglvFTrP4drChL 0TK0sgQ7XxOJYmEjDkBZ3pBXPjeLVJrClpGRY+WDzIbNFsoeNLvbK6lSS8lIFcQUcz fJ6CNRDx6VmzW+XLkxMzYKQMG+ewzM2vfRUJMWbbpgYlMgmaxhuMyVqdpw2D7uYcCh 2HEdOLrbGzen+7epyiZSSOa4Req08bs6dEEi0OwbpT3k/evRWr6bVC+o5viKsq6hAP DJ6zixHo7H2Pq5GInPWSDQigEgxn1DCr+9X7NY5yh+qKEuGT4QL5x/KL6IF+oSTFRh nQIotRmVVF0Dw== Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 15:56:00 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Maxime Chevallier Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Andrew Lunn , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Russell King , Heiner Kallweit , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Christophe Leroy , Herve Codina , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , =?UTF-8?B?S8O2cnk=?= Maincent , Marek =?UTF-8?B?QmVow7pu?= , Oleksij Rempel , =?UTF-8?B?Tmljb2zDsg==?= Veronese , Simon Horman , mwojtas@chromium.org, Romain Gantois , Daniel Golle , Dimitri Fedrau , Frank Wunderlich , Pietro Ameruoso , Aleksei Sviridkin Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v18 00/10] net: phy_port: SFP modules representation and phy_port listing Message-ID: <20260930155600.3b18c7c7@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260927133619.955236-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> References: <20260927133619.955236-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 27 Sep 2026 15:36:09 +0200 Maxime Chevallier wrote: > What this series doesn't do : > - We don't support selecting which port is active. This is the next step. > - We only support PHY-driven combo ports. The end-goal of this whole > journey that started with phy_link_topology is to get support for MII > muxes, such as the one we have on the Turris Omnia. This will eventually > be upstreamed as well. Any plans for representing a few "complex but expected to work" cases with netdevsim? Or are you thinking of trying to cover this with NIPA HW tests?