mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: "Srinivas Pandruvada" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	"Hans de Goede" <hansg@kernel.org>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"David E Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 20/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Describe the device creation policy on the function
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 10:29:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930172918.743656-21-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930172918.743656-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

The comment explaining the error policy of tpmi_create_devices() sits
inside the loop, between the call and the check it describes. Move it
above the function, where it describes the policy as a whole.

Also split the check into its two cases, skipping unsupported features
and failing on any other error, so that each reads on its own.

No functional change intended.

Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi_common.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi_common.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi_common.c
index 52d843501020..83ea576e4db1 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi_common.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi_common.c
@@ -601,6 +601,14 @@ static int tpmi_create_device(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info,
 	return intel_vsec_add_aux(tpmi_info->tpmi_dev, feature_vsec_dev, name);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Create a device for every feature in the PFS that has one.
+ *
+ * A feature that is not supported is reported as -EOPNOTSUPP and skipped.
+ * Any other error fails the driver load. intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource
+ * managed, so the devices created before such a failure need no clean up
+ * here.
+ */
 static int tpmi_create_devices(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -608,14 +616,9 @@ static int tpmi_create_devices(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info)
 	for (int i = 0; i < tpmi_info->feature_count; i++) {
 		ret = tpmi_create_device(tpmi_info, &tpmi_info->tpmi_features[i],
 					 tpmi_info->pfs_start);
-		/*
-		 * Fail, if the supported features fails to create device,
-		 * otherwise, continue. Even if one device failed to create,
-		 * fail the loading of driver. Since intel_vsec_add_aux()
-		 * is resource managed, no clean up is required for the
-		 * successfully created devices.
-		 */
-		if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+		if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
+			continue;
+		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-- 
2.43.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-30 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-30 17:28 [PATCH v3 00/20] Decouple PCI and auxbus details from Intel TPMI driver Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:28 ` [PATCH v3 01/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Use static strings for the feature device names Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:28 ` [PATCH v3 02/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Pass a struct device to intel_vsec_set_mapping() Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 03/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Remove unused vsec_dev from intel_tpmi_pm_feature Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 04/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Get tpmi_info directly from the parent device Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 05/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Keep the feature resources in intel_tpmi_info Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 06/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Describe a TPMI instance by its two devices Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 07/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Drop unused arg from tpmi_set_control_base() Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 08/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Do not assume TPMI is enumerated from PCI Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 09/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Split out enumeration independent init and exit Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 10/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Split off the PCI VSEC enumeration Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 11/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Include the headers tpmi_common.c relies on Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 12/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Turn TPMI_GET_SINGLE_ENTRY_SIZE() into a function Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-10-01 18:04   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 13/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Use guard() for tpmi_dev_lock in the status read Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 14/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Use scope based cleanup in the memory dump Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-10-01 18:06   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-01 18:18     ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 15/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Build the TPMI control words in one expression Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 16/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Use DEFINE_SHOW_STORE_ATTRIBUTE() for mem_write Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 17/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Use scnprintf() to build the debugfs names Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 18/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Use DEFINE_RES_MEM() for the feature resources Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-10-01 18:09   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 19/20] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Declare the loop counters in their loops Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-10-01 18:12   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-01 21:02     ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-30 17:29 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260930172918.743656-21-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®