From: Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: share one tags_srcu instance across all tag sets
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 17:17:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001-bug-blk-mq-global-tags-srcu-v1-1-e8415da10d1b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-bug-blk-mq-global-tags-srcu-v1-0-e8415da10d1b@gmail.com>
Freed request pages and flush queues are handed to call_srcu() so that
concurrent tag iterators never see them disappear. Each tag set embeds
its own srcu_struct for this, which blk_mq_free_tag_set() has to drain
with srcu_barrier() before cleanup_srcu_struct(). The barrier waits for
a full SRCU grace period even when the callbacks are long done, adding
1-3 ms to every tag set teardown. Drivers that free tag sets under a
lock make it worse: ublk does it under the global ublk_ctl_mutex, so
deleting devices from many threads serializes on that grace period.
The callbacks free memory that only blk-mq owns. They touch neither
the tag set nor driver code, so they don't need a per-set domain.
Replace the per-set srcu_struct with a single global one. Freeing a tag
set no longer waits for a grace period, and each tag set no longer
allocates per-CPU SRCU state. The read side is unchanged. The only cost
is that a long-running iterator can now delay these frees for other tag
sets too, which only postpones freeing memory.
On 7.3-rc5 in a 16-vCPU VM, with 1 queue and depth 16 per ublk device,
median of 3 runs (5 for the 16-thread null_blk case):
before after
ublk DEL_DEV p50, serial 3.45 ms 0.17 ms
ublk delete 1000 devices, serial 19.5 s 14.9 s
ublk delete 4000 devices, 16 thr 19.0 s 2.9 s
null_blk destroy 500 devs, serial 9.97 s 9.25 s
null_blk destroy 256 devs, 16 thr 5.15 s 4.30 s
Fixes: ad0d05dbddc1 ("blk-mq: Defer freeing of tags page_list to SRCU callback")
Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com>
---
block/blk-mq-tag.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
block/blk-mq.c | 15 ++++-----------
block/blk-mq.h | 2 ++
include/linux/blk-mq.h | 3 ---
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 35deee5bbc739..6e01309226716 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -18,6 +18,13 @@
#include "blk-mq.h"
#include "blk-mq-sched.h"
+/*
+ * Protects tag iteration against the deferred freeing of tags->page_list and
+ * flush queues. The callbacks touch neither the tag set nor driver code, so
+ * one global instance is enough and freeing a tag set needn't wait for them.
+ */
+DEFINE_SRCU(blk_mq_tags_srcu);
+
/*
* Recalculate wakeup batch when tag is shared by hctx.
*/
@@ -443,7 +450,7 @@ void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
unsigned int flags = tagset->flags;
int i, nr_tags, srcu_idx;
- srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&tagset->tags_srcu);
+ srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&blk_mq_tags_srcu);
nr_tags = blk_mq_is_shared_tags(flags) ? 1 : tagset->nr_hw_queues;
@@ -452,7 +459,7 @@ void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
__blk_mq_all_tag_iter(tagset->tags[i], fn, priv,
BT_TAG_ITER_STARTED);
}
- srcu_read_unlock(&tagset->tags_srcu, srcu_idx);
+ srcu_read_unlock(&blk_mq_tags_srcu, srcu_idx);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter);
@@ -512,7 +519,7 @@ void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_tag_iter_fn *fn,
if (!percpu_ref_tryget(&q->q_usage_counter))
return;
- srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&q->tag_set->tags_srcu);
+ srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&blk_mq_tags_srcu);
if (blk_mq_is_shared_tags(q->tag_set->flags)) {
struct blk_mq_tags *tags = q->tag_set->shared_tags;
struct sbitmap_queue *bresv = &tags->breserved_tags;
@@ -542,7 +549,7 @@ void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_tag_iter_fn *fn,
bt_for_each(hctx, q, btags, fn, priv, false);
}
}
- srcu_read_unlock(&q->tag_set->tags_srcu, srcu_idx);
+ srcu_read_unlock(&blk_mq_tags_srcu, srcu_idx);
blk_queue_exit(q);
}
@@ -618,7 +625,7 @@ void blk_mq_free_tags(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags)
return;
}
- call_srcu(&set->tags_srcu, &tags->rcu_head, blk_mq_free_tags_callback);
+ call_srcu(&blk_mq_tags_srcu, &tags->rcu_head, blk_mq_free_tags_callback);
}
void blk_mq_tag_resize_shared_tags(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, unsigned int size)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index a26a11c73ee3e..f4ba1ac92a228 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -3683,9 +3683,9 @@ static bool blk_mq_hctx_has_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
};
int srcu_idx;
- srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&hctx->queue->tag_set->tags_srcu);
+ srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&blk_mq_tags_srcu);
blk_mq_all_tag_iter(tags, blk_mq_has_request, &data);
- srcu_read_unlock(&hctx->queue->tag_set->tags_srcu, srcu_idx);
+ srcu_read_unlock(&blk_mq_tags_srcu, srcu_idx);
return data.has_rq;
}
@@ -3957,7 +3957,7 @@ static void blk_mq_exit_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
if (set->ops->exit_hctx)
set->ops->exit_hctx(hctx, hctx_idx);
- call_srcu(&set->tags_srcu, &hctx->fq->rcu_head,
+ call_srcu(&blk_mq_tags_srcu, &hctx->fq->rcu_head,
blk_free_flush_queue_callback);
hctx->fq = NULL;
@@ -4884,9 +4884,6 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
if (ret)
goto out_free_srcu;
}
- ret = init_srcu_struct(&set->tags_srcu);
- if (ret)
- goto out_cleanup_srcu;
init_rwsem(&set->update_nr_hwq_lock);
@@ -4895,7 +4892,7 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
sizeof(struct blk_mq_tags *), GFP_KERNEL,
set->numa_node);
if (!set->tags)
- goto out_cleanup_tags_srcu;
+ goto out_cleanup_srcu;
for (i = 0; i < set->nr_maps; i++) {
set->map[i].mq_map = kcalloc_node(nr_cpu_ids,
@@ -4924,8 +4921,6 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
}
kfree(set->tags);
set->tags = NULL;
-out_cleanup_tags_srcu:
- cleanup_srcu_struct(&set->tags_srcu);
out_cleanup_srcu:
if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
cleanup_srcu_struct(set->srcu);
@@ -4972,8 +4967,6 @@ void blk_mq_free_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
kfree(set->tags);
set->tags = NULL;
- srcu_barrier(&set->tags_srcu);
- cleanup_srcu_struct(&set->tags_srcu);
if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING) {
srcu_barrier(set->srcu);
cleanup_srcu_struct(set->srcu);
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index aa15d31aaae9b..e6b463da50712 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_init_tags(unsigned int nr_tags,
unsigned int reserved_tags, unsigned int flags, int node);
void blk_mq_free_tags(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags);
+extern struct srcu_struct blk_mq_tags_srcu;
+
unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data);
unsigned long blk_mq_get_tags(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data, int nr_tags,
unsigned int *offset);
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index af878597afb8c..5e130b282b42f 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -525,8 +525,6 @@ enum hctx_type {
* request_queue.tag_set_list.
* @srcu: Use as lock when type of the request queue is blocking
* (BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING).
- * @tags_srcu: SRCU used to defer freeing of tags page_list to prevent
- * use-after-free when iterating tags.
* @update_nr_hwq_lock:
* Synchronize updating nr_hw_queues with add/del disk &
* switching elevator.
@@ -551,7 +549,6 @@ struct blk_mq_tag_set {
struct mutex tag_list_lock;
struct list_head tag_list;
struct srcu_struct *srcu;
- struct srcu_struct tags_srcu;
struct rw_semaphore update_nr_hwq_lock;
};
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 9:17 [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq: stop waiting for an SRCU grace period when freeing a tag set Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-01 9:17 ` Qiliang Yuan [this message]
2026-10-01 9:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: drop the tag_set argument from blk_mq_free_rq_map/tags Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-01 16:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq: stop waiting for an SRCU grace period when freeing a tag set Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-15 2:26 ` Qiliang Yuan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001-bug-blk-mq-global-tags-srcu-v1-1-e8415da10d1b@gmail.com \
--to=odys.yuan@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®