From: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm/slub: preserve no-lock freeing after memcg charge failure
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 06:40:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001044056.75079-2-kmehltretter@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001044056.75079-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com>
kmalloc_nolock() can obtain an object before its memcg
post-allocation charge fails. For a single object,
memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook() rolls the allocation back through
memcg_alloc_abort_single(). That enters the regular SLUB free path,
which can take a sleeping list_lock on PREEMPT_RT even though the caller
selected a no-lock allocation.
Use kfree_nolock() when the allocation flags disallow spinning. This
keeps the SLUB object rollback on the no-lock free path. The failed
allocation continues to return NULL.
Fixes: af92793e52c3 ("slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock().")
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 54ec125033571..a1f08338102e2 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2519,7 +2519,10 @@ bool memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
return true;
if (likely(size == 1)) {
- memcg_alloc_abort_single(s, *p);
+ if (alloc_flags_allow_spinning(ac->alloc_flags))
+ memcg_alloc_abort_single(s, *p);
+ else
+ kfree_nolock(*p);
*p = NULL;
} else {
kmem_cache_free_bulk(s, size, p);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 4:40 [PATCH 0/2] mm: preserve nolock context through memcg cleanup Karl Mehltretter
2026-10-01 4:40 ` Karl Mehltretter [this message]
2026-10-01 4:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/memcontrol: defer final objcg release from no-lock frees Karl Mehltretter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001044056.75079-2-kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--to=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®