From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
brcm80211@lists.linux.dev, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: avoid sleeping tx locks in netpoll context
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:57:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001075755.3MilPS2C@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930185417.61865-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com>
On 2026-09-30 20:54:17 [+0200], Karl Mehltretter wrote:
> With the default fcmode=0, netpoll calls ndo_start_xmit() with hard
> interrupts disabled and reaches brcmf_sdio_bus_txdata() directly. The
> function takes txq_lock with spin_lock_bh(), and the queue helper takes
> the embedded sk_buff_head lock. These locks may sleep on PREEMPT_RT.
> On non-RT, spin_unlock_bh() can run pending networking softirqs before
> netpoll releases the transmit lock, causing a recursive transmit
> deadlock.
>
> Use spin_trylock() for IRQ-disabled calls and enqueue with the unlocked
> skb helper while holding txq_lock. On PREEMPT_RT, reject hard IRQ and NMI
> callers, where rt-spinlocks cannot be acquired. If the lock is busy or
> the queue is full, return through the existing drop path. Do not evict an
> older packet from this context. Suppress the queue-full printk because
> netconsole can recursively enter this path.
>
> The flow-control callback takes another spinlock, so defer it when an
> IRQ-disabled enqueue reaches TXHI. The data worker rechecks the bus state
> and queue length under txq_lock before stopping the queue. Existing TXLOW
> handling wakes the queue after it drains.
>
> This fixes the direct SDIO transmit path used by fcmode=0. Modes 1 and 2
> take the FWS lock first and need a separate change.
Is this the only affected driver?
Do you have maybe a backtrace?
> Fixes: ac3d9dd034e5 ("netpoll: make ndo_poll_controller() optional")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Sebastian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 18:54 Karl Mehltretter
2026-10-01 7:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001075755.3MilPS2C@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®