From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: ljs@kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org,
vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, riel@surriel.com, harry@kernel.org,
jannh@google.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, pfalcato@suse.de,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pan.deng@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vma: don't remove VMA from rmap if pgoff unchanged
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 23:45:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001154511.23931-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930-speed-up-inplace-rmap-v2-1-ac1aa19708aa@kernel.org>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 06:53:36PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
>When updating a VMA, vma_prepare() unconditionally removes it from its rmap
>interval trees under the rmap lock, and vma_complete() reinserts it before
>releasing the lock.
>
>This is wholly unnecessary if its page offset (file rmap) or anonymous page
>offset (anon rmap) is unchanged.
>
>So, track whether they will change in the newly introduced
>vp->file_pgoff_unchanged and vp->anon_pgoff_unchanged fields, and use them
>to determine whether to remove the VMA or not.
>
>The rmap lock keeps things safe as no rmap walks can concurrently occur
>during the operation.
>
>Additionally, some architectures (arm, parisc, nios2, csky) have dcache
>flush rmap walkers which take only flush_dcache_mmap_lock(), which is
>likewise held across the operation.
>
>If the VMA remains in the tree, it's necessary to keep the augmented
>rb_subtree_last field updated to reflect its changed range.
>
>Provide mapping_rmap_tree_[pre, post]_update() and
>anon_rmap_tree_[pre, post]_update_vma() (replacing the existing logic in
>the anonymous case) to handle both the changed and unchanged cases.
>
>For the anon rmap case, with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_RB set, avc->cached_vma_last
>is also updated when propagating in place.
>
>When performing a VMA shrink or a split where the VMA is the lower one, the
>page offset cannot change, so set the flags unconditionally in these cases.
>
>When merging VMAs the page offset is unchanged only in some cases, so
>update init_multi_vma_prep() to set the flags only if the page offsets
>remain the same.
>
>Finally, while we're here, also update expand_upwards() similarly.
>
>These changes ultimately result in less rmap lock contention.
>
>Pan Deng reported results using the UnixBench/excel benchmark on a 2-socket
>192 core, 384 thread x86-64 system for v7.3-rc4 with/without the patch
>applied:
>
>Execl Throughput, index score:
>
> avg %stdev min max
> v7.3-rc4 3511.5 0.44% 3494.5 3543.4
> + patch 4069.0 0.48% 4047.4 4109.5 (+15.9%)
>
>Average wait on file rmap lock in ms, 5 runs per kernel:
>
> avg %stdev min max
> v7.3-rc4 9.470 2.91% 9.070 9.820
> + patch 8.420 3.34% 8.100 8.770 (-11.1%)
>
>Profiling data obtained during the operation highlighted the file rmap lock
>as the primary source of contention.
>
>Suggested-by: Pan Deng <pan.deng@intel.com>
>Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
>---
Wow, pretty cool stuff. That's a nice speedup!
[...]
>+static void anon_rmap_tree_update_inplace(struct anon_vma_chain *avc)
>+{
>+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_RB
>+ avc->cached_vma_last = avc_last_pgoff(avc);
>+#endif
>+ /* Propagate all the way up the tree. */
Nit: propagate() can stop early when rb_subtree_last is unchanged ...
Maybe:
/* Update the subtree maximum and propagate any changes up the tree. */
>+ __anon_rmap_tree_augment.propagate(&avc->rb, NULL);
>+}
>+
[...]
Acked-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Hammered it with VMA churn (split/merge/mremap/madvise/fork) + concurrent
rmap walks + hwpoison injection. Nothing complained :D
Tested-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cheers, Lance
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 17:53 Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-01 15:45 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2026-10-02 14:05 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-02 14:15 ` Lance Yang
2026-10-02 14:24 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-10-02 14:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001154511.23931-1-lance.yang@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pan.deng@intel.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®