From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: fsverity@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fsverity: RCU-delay the freeing of struct fsverity_info
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 10:13:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001171349.81454-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
__fsverity_get_info() calls rhashtable_lookup_fast(), which just uses
rcu_read_lock() and doesn't directly synchronize with
fsverity_remove_info().
For the same inode this isn't a problem: its fsverity_info is removed
only at inode eviction time or upon failure to enable verity, when the
inode no longer needs its fsverity_info and it will no longer be
accessed via that inode.
However, this is broken and can cause a use-after-free for concurrent
__fsverity_get_info() for *different* inodes. Those rely on following
fsverity_info::rhash_head in the rhashtable under rcu_read_lock() only.
They also use fsverity_info::inode to do the key comparison.
Fix this by RCU-delaying the freeing of 'struct fsverity_info' after
it's been removed from the rhashtable.
Fixes: f77f281b6118 ("fsverity: use a hashtable to find the fsverity_info")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
---
fs/verity/fsverity_private.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
fs/verity/open.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/verity/fsverity_private.h b/fs/verity/fsverity_private.h
index 881d46f25e08..6f85f63861aa 100644
--- a/fs/verity/fsverity_private.h
+++ b/fs/verity/fsverity_private.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "fs-verity: " fmt
#include <linux/fsverity.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/rhashtable.h>
/*
@@ -76,7 +77,19 @@ struct merkle_tree_params {
struct fsverity_info {
struct rhash_head rhash_head;
struct merkle_tree_params tree_params;
- u8 root_hash[FS_VERITY_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
+ union {
+ u8 root_hash[FS_VERITY_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
+
+ /*
+ * Used for final freeing of the struct, in which case root_hash
+ * is no longer needed. Specifically, the only fields needed
+ * besides the rcu_head are those needed by fsverity_free_info()
+ * itself, and those that can be accessed by fsverity_get_info()
+ * (rhash_head and inode) during the RCU-protected rhashtable
+ * chain search trying to find another inode's fsverity_info.
+ */
+ struct rcu_head rcu_head;
+ };
u8 file_digest[FS_VERITY_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
struct inode *inode;
unsigned long *hash_block_verified;
diff --git a/fs/verity/open.c b/fs/verity/open.c
index d0c56a7faa3b..52c8cd014921 100644
--- a/fs/verity/open.c
+++ b/fs/verity/open.c
@@ -399,11 +399,22 @@ void fsverity_free_info(struct fsverity_info *vi)
kmem_cache_free(fsverity_info_cachep, vi);
}
+static void fsverity_free_info_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+ fsverity_free_info(container_of(head, struct fsverity_info, rcu_head));
+}
+
void fsverity_remove_info(struct fsverity_info *vi)
{
rhashtable_remove_fast(&fsverity_info_hash, &vi->rhash_head,
fsverity_info_hash_params);
- fsverity_free_info(vi);
+ /*
+ * The freeing must be RCU-delayed because __fsverity_get_info() for a
+ * *different* inode's fsverity_info in the same rhashtable hash chain
+ * can still be accessing *this* fsverity_info's rhash_head and inode
+ * fields as part of the RCU-protected hash chain search.
+ */
+ call_rcu(&vi->rcu_head, fsverity_free_info_rcu);
}
void fsverity_cleanup_inode(struct inode *inode)
base-commit: 551c722f40809618230001baccf219193e22fc5a
--
2.56.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 17:13 Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-10-01 21:23 ` Sandeep Dhavale
2026-10-02 21:45 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001171349.81454-1-ebiggers@kernel.org \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®