From: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: reject a netdev that implements only one hwtstamp NDO
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 11:42:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002094211.2350702-4-nb@tipi-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002094211.2350702-1-nb@tipi-net.de>
ndo_hwtstamp_get and ndo_hwtstamp_set only make sense as a pair. A
driver providing just one gets no complaint today, and the mismatch
turns up in user space, where a set can succeed while the matching get
fails.
Catch it at registration instead.
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
---
net/core/dev.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index ca7f4844cc40..db765cb5811e 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -11462,6 +11462,11 @@ static int netdev_check_ops(struct net_device *dev)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (!ops->ndo_hwtstamp_get != !ops->ndo_hwtstamp_set) {
+ netdev_WARN(dev, "driver implements only one hwtstamp NDO\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (netdev_need_ops_lock(dev) && ops->ndo_set_rx_mode &&
!ops->ndo_set_rx_mode_async) {
netdev_WARN(dev, "ops-locked drivers should use ndo_set_rx_mode_async\n");
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20261002094211.2350702-1-nb@tipi-net.de>
2026-10-02 9:42 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: move the netdev_ops checks into a helper Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-02 9:42 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: reject ops-locked drivers without ndo_set_rx_mode_async Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-02 9:42 ` Nicolai Buchwitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002094211.2350702-4-nb@tipi-net.de \
--to=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®