From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pedro Fonseca <pedro@fonseca.com.pt>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Unlock for command abort polling
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 11:33:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002113302.3fe23d24.michal.pecio@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824095944.1c8335fa.michal.pecio@gmail.com>
On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 09:59:44 +0200, Michal Pecio wrote:
> xhci_abort_cmd_ring() requests abort, waits for the CRR bit to clear,
> drops xhci->lock and waits for the Command Ring Stopped event.
>
> The CRR wait timeout is 5 seconds as suggested by xHCI 4.6.1.2, which
> means that if the xHC fails to complete the operation at all, we poll
> with the lock held and IRQs disabled for several seconds. If any other
> CPU tries to acquire the lock, it will spin likewise. IRQs get delays,
> drivers log errors, tasks freeze, it's a mess.
>
> So drop the lock earlier, before waiting for the CRR bit. It should be
> safe - the sole caller sets cmd_ring_state to CMD_RING_STATE_ABORTED
> before calling us, which will prevent others from ringing the command
> doorbell and interfering with the abort. Queuing new commands during
> this time poses no danger, and if the command we try to abort actually
> completes concurrently, existing code already needs to deal with this.
> And in my testing it does - it's trivial to trigger this on ASM1042,
> where Address Device can't be aborted, but it completes as soon as the
> offending device is unplugged, including during abort attempt.
>
> Note that the lock still covers reinit_completion(), so it won't race
> with complete() being called by the event handler. And works are not
> reentrant, so another timeout can't expire while the lock is dropped.
> We will configure timeout anew when restarting the ring.
>
> One other difference is that now we also drop the lock if abort fails.
> This too should be harmless. Commands queued during this time will be
> released like any other pending commands. If the aborted command does
> complete before we regain the lock, it's a waste, but not regression.
>
> Reported-by: Pedro Fonseca <pedro@fonseca.com.pt>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/16f65081-5a3c-4c30-9811-9017796a3373@fonseca.com.pt/
> Signed-off-by: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> This has been annoying me and various others for years, only the latest
> incident is listed above.
>
> I expected a nightmare of race conditions, but after finally taking a
> serious look I think it really is quite simple. It helps that the lock
> was already being dropped and existing code seems to handle it fine.
Hi Mathias,
Any thoughts about this one? Seems we haven't got any response from
Pedro, but the patch worked for me (and it solves an annoying bug).
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> index 8b0c27d6f12d..44a0f89110a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> @@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static int xhci_abort_cmd_ring(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, unsigned long flags)
> struct xhci_segment *new_seg = xhci->cmd_ring->deq_seg;
> union xhci_trb *new_deq = xhci->cmd_ring->dequeue;
> u64 crcr;
> - int ret;
> + int ret, completed;
>
> xhci_dbg(xhci, "Abort command ring\n");
>
> @@ -521,25 +521,27 @@ static int xhci_abort_cmd_ring(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, unsigned long flags)
> * In the future we should distinguish between -ENODEV and -ETIMEDOUT
> * and try to recover a -ETIMEDOUT with a host controller reset.
> */
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags);
> ret = xhci_handshake(&xhci->op_regs->cmd_ring,
> CMD_RING_RUNNING, 0, 5 * 1000 * 1000);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - xhci_err(xhci, "Abort failed to stop command ring: %d\n", ret);
> - xhci_halt(xhci);
> - xhci_hc_died(xhci);
> - return ret;
> - }
> /*
> * Writing the CMD_RING_ABORT bit should cause a cmd completion event,
> * however on some host hw the CMD_RING_RUNNING bit is correctly cleared
> * but the completion event in never sent. Wait 2 secs (arbitrary
> * number) to handle those cases after negation of CMD_RING_RUNNING.
> */
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags);
> - ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&xhci->cmd_ring_stop_completion,
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + completed = wait_for_completion_timeout(&xhci->cmd_ring_stop_completion,
> msecs_to_jiffies(2000));
> spin_lock_irqsave(&xhci->lock, flags);
> - if (!ret) {
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + xhci_err(xhci, "Abort failed to stop command ring: %d\n", ret);
> + xhci_halt(xhci);
> + xhci_hc_died(xhci);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + if (!completed) {
> xhci_dbg(xhci, "No stop event for abort, ring start fail?\n");
> xhci_cleanup_command_queue(xhci);
> } else {
> --
> 2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 7:59 Michal Pecio
2026-10-02 9:33 ` Michal Pecio [this message]
2026-10-02 10:37 ` Mathias Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002113302.3fe23d24.michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=pedro@fonseca.com.pt \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®