mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: maddy@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: sshegde@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, boqun@kernel.org,
	will@kernel.org, jhladky@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org
Subject: [RFC 0/3] powerpc64: Preempt count optimizations
Date: Fri,  2 Oct 2026 22:16:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002164619.1455143-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

This is an RFC and initial implementation of the idea which was discussed
in few threads. [1][2][3]

It is lightly tested, but given changes are involving the core api,
it definitely needs more testing. Also I need to investigate the
patches in more detail and likely changelogs needs update too.

Please go ahead and try to see if works/breaks for you.

Ideas in brief:

1. Move preempt count to PACA.
   preempt count in PACA is better as it make it direct access from r13 instead of
   obtaining from thread info. 

2. Fold need_resched into preempt count.
   Also it was noted that adopting similar style of folding need_resched
   into preempt count as ARM64 is better as it helps load-store archs and
   helps to avoid accessing thread info in fast paths.

3. Enable HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS.
   While there enable the HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS which is a
   recent trick to fold the NMI bits into preempt count(29-32bits)
   instead of using separate per_cpu count.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/e8efdade-161e-4efe-8bd3-abb12ad45dee@linux.ibm.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/1eab63fc-b70d-41ef-b720-8ae77d8e56d8@linux.ibm.com/#t
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260805094219.GM687043@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/

Below are hackbench results.

Test                       	  Baseline    Patched   Gain
=============================================================
Hackbench process 10 groups         1.000x    0.991x   +0.88%
Hackbench process 20 groups         1.000x    0.972x   +2.81%
Hackbench process 30 groups         1.000x    0.976x   +2.37%
Hackbench process 40 groups         1.000x    0.979x   +2.11%
Hackbench process 50 groups         1.000x    0.980x   +2.05%
Hackbench process 60 groups         1.000x    0.982x   +1.79%
Hackbench thread 10  groups         1.000x    0.978x   +2.23%
Hackbench thread 20  groups         1.000x    0.971x   +2.93%
Hackbench process pipe 10 groups    1.000x    0.957x   +4.35%
Hackbench process pipe 20 groups    1.000x    0.977x   +2.32%
Hackbench process pipe 30 groups    1.000x    0.981x   +1.95%
Hackbench process pipe 40 groups    1.000x    0.981x   +1.93%
Hackbench process pipe 50 groups    1.000x    0.975x   +2.54%
Hackbench process pipe 60 groups    1.000x    1.024x   -2.37%
Hackbench thread pipe 10 groups     1.000x    0.970x   +3.04%
Hackbench thread pipe 20 groups     1.000x    0.981x   +1.89%

Things tested(no warnings/crash):
- Build and boot.
- hackbench run.
- daytrader run.
- kexec.

Shrikanth Hegde (3):
  powerpc64: move preempt count to paca
  powerpc64/preempt: Add need_resched bit inside preempt_count
  powerpc64/Kconfig: Enable HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS

 arch/powerpc/Kconfig                   |   1 +
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h        |  12 +++
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/preempt.h     | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h |  14 ++-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c             |   1 +
 arch/powerpc/kexec/core_64.c           |   2 +-
 6 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/preempt.h

-- 
2.52.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-02 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-02 16:46 Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-10-02 16:46 ` [RFC 1/3] powerpc64: move preempt count to paca Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-02 16:46 ` [RFC 2/3] powerpc64/preempt: Add need_resched bit inside preempt_count Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-02 16:46 ` [RFC 3/3] powerpc64/Kconfig: Enable HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261002164619.1455143-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=jhladky@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®