From: Artem Dinaburg <artem@trailofbits.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Artem Dinaburg <artem@trailofbits.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] drm/i915/hdcp: Add encoder check in intel_hdcp_get_capability
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 15:40:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002194030.20489-2-artem@trailofbits.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002194030.20489-1-artem@trailofbits.com>
From: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 31b42af516afa1e184d1a9f9dd4096c54044269a ]
Sometimes during hotplug scenario or suspend/resume scenario encoder is
not always initialized when intel_hdcp_get_capability add
a check to avoid kernel null pointer dereference.
[ Backport to 6.1.y: this tree uses the older intel_hdcp_capable()
helper name. Apply the same guard there; the code change is otherwise
unchanged. ]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240722064451.3610512-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Artem Dinaburg <artem@trailofbits.com>
---
Hi Greg, Sasha, and drm i915 maintainers,
I am working through the small CVE backports still missing from 6.1.y.
This one addresses CVE-2024-53051. It rejects the HDCP capability query
when hotplug or resume left the encoder unset.
The 6.6.y backport went out as the same 2-patch series and has been
picked up for 6.6.y. The fix is already present in 6.12.y, 6.18.y, and
7.2.y, but not in 6.1.y.
The target-specific adjustment is recorded in the bracketed note above.
Could you please queue it for 6.1.y?
CVE: CVE-2024-53051
Upstream: 31b42af516afa1e184d1a9f9dd4096c54044269a
AI assistance: An LLM helped identify, adapt, and validate this backport; I
reviewed the resulting code and validation evidence.
Thanks,
Artem Dinaburg
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
index cb7f86de967a88..507721c94f2fdd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
@@ -182,11 +182,16 @@ int intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
/* Is HDCP1.4 capable on Platform and Sink */
bool intel_hdcp_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
{
- struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
+ struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim = connector->hdcp.shim;
bool capable = false;
u8 bksv[5];
+ if (!intel_attached_encoder(connector))
+ return capable;
+
+ dig_port = intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
+
if (!shim)
return capable;
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-02 19:40 [PATCH 6.1.y 0/2] drm/i915/hdcp: guard both capability checks Artem Dinaburg
2026-10-02 19:40 ` Artem Dinaburg [this message]
2026-10-02 19:40 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] drm/i915/hdcp: Add encoder check in hdcp2_get_capability Artem Dinaburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002194030.20489-2-artem@trailofbits.com \
--to=artem@trailofbits.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®