From: Yongzhao Chen <yongzhao.derek@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: qca83xx: read resolved QCA8337 link status
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 22:35:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002203522.1219-1-yongzhao.derek@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7eed302b-d455-447f-9ce9-f15468b9792b@lunn.ch>
Hi Andrew,
> The traffic failure was however because of the error with setting the
> DACs?
No, sorry, my last mail was not clear about this. The failure was on
a QCA8337 user port connected to a NAS, not on the IPQ5018 CPU link
from the DAC investigation. With the same OpenWrt 6.18.52 diagnostic
image and unchanged DAC settings, switching only that user PHY's
read_status changed the MAC speed from an incorrect 1000 Mb/s to the
actual 100 Mb/s and restored ping in both directions.
> Reporting the correct downshift has nothing to do with that, as far as
> i understand. Correctly reporting downshift i would put to net-next.
If net-next is still your preference with that in mind, I will send
v2 there.
Thanks,
Yongzhao Chen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 22:07 Yongzhao Chen
2026-09-29 0:40 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-30 21:23 ` Yongzhao Chen
2026-09-30 21:33 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-01 18:16 ` Yongzhao Chen
2026-10-01 18:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-02 20:35 ` Yongzhao Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002203522.1219-1-yongzhao.derek@gmail.com \
--to=yongzhao.derek@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®