From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de,
terry.bowman@amd.com, kanie@linux.alibaba.com, olof@lixom.net
Subject: [PATCH v15 2/4] PCI/ACPI: Tidy _OSC control bit checking
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 14:18:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002211828.1293177-3-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002211828.1293177-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Add OSC_OWNER() helper to prettify checking the _OSC control bits to learn
whether the platform has granted us control of PCI features. No functional
change intended.
[bhelgaas: split to separate patch, commit log]
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) <rafael@kernel.org>
---
Changes since v14
* No change.
v14 posting
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260922204548.3884906-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com
Changes since v13
* No change. Picked up Rafael's Acked-by.
v13 posting
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260919162655.3499010-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 88c65f34e305..756dc2f055f5 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -993,6 +993,12 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_release_info(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
__acpi_pci_root_release_info(bridge->release_data);
}
+#define OSC_OWNER(ctrl, bit, flag) \
+ do { \
+ if (!((ctrl) & (bit))) \
+ flag = 0; \
+ } while (0)
+
struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
struct acpi_pci_root_ops *ops,
struct acpi_pci_root_info *info,
@@ -1003,6 +1009,7 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
int node = acpi_get_node(device->handle);
struct pci_bus *bus;
struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge;
+ u32 ctrl, ext_ctrl;
info->root = root;
info->bridge = device;
@@ -1028,21 +1035,21 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
goto out_release_info;
host_bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(bus->bridge);
- if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
- host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 0;
- if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
- host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 0;
- if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL))
- host_bridge->native_aer = 0;
- if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL))
- host_bridge->native_pme = 0;
- if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL))
- host_bridge->native_ltr = 0;
- if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL))
- host_bridge->native_dpc = 0;
-
- if (!(root->osc_ext_control_set & OSC_CXL_ERROR_REPORTING_CONTROL))
- host_bridge->native_cxl_error = 0;
+
+ ctrl = root->osc_control_set;
+ ext_ctrl = root->osc_ext_control_set;
+
+ OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL,
+ host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug);
+ OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL,
+ host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug);
+ OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_aer);
+ OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_pme);
+ OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_ltr);
+ OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_dpc);
+
+ OSC_OWNER(ext_ctrl, OSC_CXL_ERROR_REPORTING_CONTROL,
+ host_bridge->native_cxl_error);
acpi_dev_power_up_children_with_adr(device);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-02 21:18 [PATCH v15 0/4] Simplify PCIe native ownership Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-10-02 21:18 ` [PATCH v15 1/4] PCI: Assume control of portdrv-related features only when portdrv enabled Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-11-02 20:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-11-02 20:38 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-11-02 23:16 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-10-02 21:18 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2026-10-02 21:18 ` [PATCH v15 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Centralize pcie_ports_native checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-10-02 21:18 ` [PATCH v15 4/4] PCI: Centralize pci_aer_available() checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-10-05 18:04 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-10-05 22:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v15 0/4] Simplify PCIe native ownership Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-06 18:38 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002211828.1293177-3-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®