From: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>,
Linu Cherian <linu.cherian@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/20] arm64/pgtable: Clear AF with LDCLR on supported systems
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2026 00:21:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261003002123.505555-3-jthoughton@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261003002123.505555-1-jthoughton@google.com>
Replace the cmpxchg loop with atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed, which, on
systems with LSE atomics, should end up as LDCLR.
This is somewhat overdue. In recent versions of the architecture, if a
system supports FEAT_LSE, forward progress guarantees for exclusive
monitors and cmpxchg loops are relaxed.
Mechanically, I would love to write test_and_clear_bit_relaxed(), but no
such function exists (test_and_clear_bit() has full ordering, which is
also undesirable). Implementing test_and_clear_bit_relaxed() properly is
a pretty large change; use atomic64 instead, as pte_t contains a u64.
Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 14 ++++----------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 763c5a411d64..e47c3d010715 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -1252,17 +1252,11 @@ static inline void __pte_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
static inline bool __ptep_test_and_clear_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep)
{
- pte_t old_pte, pte;
+ atomic64_t *pteval = (atomic64_t *)&pte_val(*ptep);
+ s64 af_mask = PTE_AF;
- pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
- do {
- old_pte = pte;
- pte = pte_mkold(pte);
- pte_val(pte) = cmpxchg_relaxed(&pte_val(*ptep),
- pte_val(old_pte), pte_val(pte));
- } while (pte_val(pte) != pte_val(old_pte));
-
- return pte_young(pte);
+ /* Atomically clear PTE_AF, checking that it was set before. */
+ return af_mask & atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed(af_mask, pteval);
}
static inline bool __ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
--
2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-03 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-03 0:21 [PATCH v2 00/20] Another attempt at HVO support on arm64 James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] hugetlb: Don't restore vmemmap of non-HVOed folios on bulk restore error James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` James Houghton [this message]
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Always flush TLB if needed upon PTE remapping James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Leave pages partially HVOed upon restore failure James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Use try_update_vmemmap_pte to update in-use PTEs James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Allow architectures to dynamically disallow HVO James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Disable HVO sysctl if arch doesn't support HVO James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] hugetlb: Fully initialize tail struct pages of non-pre-HVOed bootmem folios James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Allow architectures to make HVO enablement boot-time only James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Expose whether HVO is enabled to architecture code James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] arm64: Add bbm_through_af capability James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] arm64: Implement try_update_vmemmap_pte using the AF trick James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] arm64: Support hugetlb vmemmap optimization James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Add fault injection for in-place vmemmap PTE updates James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] selftests/mm: Add HugeTLB vmemmap optimization stress test James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] hugetlb_vmemmap: Use try_populate_vmemmap_pmd for replacing in-use PMDs James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] arm64: Implement try_populate_vmemmap_pmd using AF trick James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] arm64: Drop BBML3 requirement for HVO James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 19/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] hugetlb_vmemmap: Add fault injection for in-place vmemmap PMD splits James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 20/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] selftests/mm: Add HVO pmd-split fault injection tests James Houghton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261003002123.505555-3-jthoughton@google.com \
--to=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=linu.cherian@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®