From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yeoreum Yun" <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Cc: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v13 01/14] coresight: etm4x: read-back TRCSEQSTR at disabling and prohibit modifying seq_state while enabling.
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 03:08:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261003030811.B35331F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261003-separate_etm_cfg_v2-v13-1-5d8a29aead95@arm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] coresight: TOCTOU race in seq_state_store bypasses active-session guard
--
commit 750a64ecfab03057a253043e06b3def402bb7137
Author: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
coresight: etm4x: read-back TRCSEQSTR at disabling and prohibit modifying seq_state while enabling.
TRCSEQSTR can be changed by the ETM while a session is active. Its value
therefore needs to be preserved when a sysfs session is disabled so that
users can read the current sequence state after the session ends.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
> @@ -1435,6 +1435,8 @@ static ssize_t seq_state_store(struct device *dev,
>
> if (kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val))
> return -EINVAL;
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(drvdata->csdev) || coresight_get_mode(drvdata->csdev))
> + return -EBUSY;
> if (val >= drvdata->nrseqstate)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> config->seq_state = val;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[Severity: Medium]
Could this active-session guard be bypassed due to a Time-of-Check to
Time-of-Use race?
If a user-space write to seq_state and an enable_source call occur
concurrently, is it possible for enable_source to succeed immediately
after this mode check passes?
If coresight_take_mode() succeeds in the racing enable_source call, it
would take drvdata->spinlock to copy the configuration for the active
session. This seq_state_store() write would then proceed without a lock,
modifying the configuration after it was already checked.
When the sysfs session is later disabled, wouldn't the old state read
from hardware overwrite the user's new value?
Should raw_spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock) be taken around this mode check
and the configuration assignment?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261003-separate_etm_cfg_v2-v13-0-5d8a29aead95@arm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-03 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-03 2:52 [PATCH RESEND v13 00/14] fix several inconsistencies with sysfs configuration in etmX Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 01/14] coresight: etm4x: read-back TRCSEQSTR at disabling and prohibit modifying seq_state while enabling Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 3:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-03 3:44 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 6:07 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 02/14] coresight: etm4x: prohibit modifying cntr_val while session is enabled Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 3:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-03 4:29 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 03/14] coresight: etm3x: prohibit modifying cntr_val and reset " Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 3:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-03 4:34 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 6:10 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 04/14] coresight: etm4x: fix inconsistencies with sysfs configuration Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 3:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-03 4:40 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 05/14] coresight: etm3x: " Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 06/14] coresight: etm3x: remove redundant cpu online check on etm_enable_sysfs() Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 07/14] coresight: etm4x: introduce struct etm4_caps Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 08/14] coresight: etm4x: exclude ss_status from drvdata->config Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 09/14] coresight: etm4x: remove s_ex_level from config Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 6:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 10/14] coresight: etm4x: rename local config as curr_config referring drvdata->curr_config Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 11/14] coresight: etm4x: rename drvdata->config to sysfs_config Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 12/14] coresight: etm3x: introduce struct etm_caps Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 13/14] coresight: etm3x: rename local config as curr_config referring drvdata->curr_config Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 14/14] coresight: etm3x: rename drvdata->config to sysfs_config Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-03 6:56 ` [PATCH RESEND v13 00/14] fix several inconsistencies with sysfs configuration in etmX Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261003030811.B35331F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®