From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 538AF41D631; Sat, 3 Oct 2026 10:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791023489; cv=none; b=GCQ0lxT9tBoaVb+wD/PSat9g4SPJWVd/vKn3dgfP/BGa+MjcSBlBxpOHPmSLCHuZn6c7rdQmOKccO7t+dFkTYizjq81iGoFwQkQ3EvERwmomaq8z4YJF75QdIbksNYz98tGEYlq62KtCgHZ7iVuM78qalCfNJg/YM8sRRPv5VuA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791023489; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ygUoJLCQKFWKOx+5CSMmis9wmbifBrGa+KU1TJomdPY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rYx3CGATF8Ey92F8+BHEobUvbnReWVpZvJM0qgfSRAc5aK6/h3Lv5rpeccD2iUqv6EFOlNsJEpySqpNXIVtHR4+fSRWWchn18cDhcptqD/r5E7baYiWLq0wEBjJU6qpNpCKhLeBZLwrDkYQTGUyd9etzPe7/fieqJQqfzWfuBM8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jJubNwg8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jJubNwg8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F7FC1F0089B; Sat, 3 Oct 2026 10:31:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791023476; bh=JD1KrrdpLVmHcYg9pYizr+EY3Jnx/IklgTtkuzFE98c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=jJubNwg8UjkFZDFCgXganeVccWeCUC64B+nvX/QJCoMYXCR46IeLHcDEoC9WXNkcA 5ruXH4DMtVtjhNA3d7Uv9pKe+IwqKHYmShLEdJJbzIpK4vuV9dVpZIJ60E6msg+z9i 4ti2IfPt7tuWzkUfzzC3uOvSCdCs+N7Wy58NOZc9wgMz5chltNhTn0TZzkalwkJPMG XYVBwyjFfZ1ZdXt14iY8a8VKJi/DAPbLmvDeLBF1DvlcoMfWEqbZ45BNIbuT/5yazm nRU/EDsrSmIva7nHl/5b7LeLaGnBwdw1GGhmcVLS3nQJaKo9nu1Q/zcaFKDoywybDy to4My81OLjUmQ== Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2026 03:31:15 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org Cc: morbo@google.com, willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, david@davidgow.net, pmladek@suse.com, shuvampandey1@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, corbet@lwn.net, senozhatsky@chromium.org, gnoack@google.com, mic@digikod.net, mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jikos@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, chleroy@kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, sbhat@linux.ibm.com, blum@kernel.org, alison.schofield@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, lgs201920130244@gmail.com, iweiny@kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-k@lists.ozlabs.org, ernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org, mason@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] seq_buf: Add seq_buf_init_append() Message-ID: <20261003103059.9e0b86-kees@kernel.org> References: <20261003035921.1918874-8-kees@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Oct 03, 2026 at 04:33:59AM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote: > This isn't a bug in the code, but is the changelog accurate when it says > seq_buf_init() "always sets the new buffer size to 0 via seq_buf_clear()"? Yeah, fair. It's not worded clearly. I've fixed the wording for v5 to say seq_buf_init() 'empties the buffer (sets its "len" to 0) via seq_buf_clear()'. -Kees -- Kees Cook