From: Stian Halseth <stian@itx.no>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [REGRESSION] tick/sched: /proc/stat idle time exceeds wall time since v7.2
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2026 16:27:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261004142724.3896396-1-stian@itx.no> (raw)
Hi,
Since v7.2-rc1, /proc/stat counts more idle time than wall time on
NO_HZ_IDLE kernels with TICK_CPU_ACCOUNTING. Monitoring that computes
CPU usage as 1 minus the idle rate shows negative usage on idle
machines.
Measured over 60 s with /proc/stat and the idle_sleeps counters in
/proc/timer_list:
SPARC T7-1, 7.3-rc5, HZ=100, 256 CPUs:
idle per wall second 1.0057 on average, 1.44 on the worst CPU
(92 tick stops/s, 4.8 ms of excess per tick stop)
amd64 (Opteron 1214), 7.2.7, HZ=1000, 2 CPUs:
idle machine: +0.03% and +0.06%
a task waking every 3.7 ms on CPU 1: +13.1% on CPU 1
(285 tick stops/s, 0.46 ms of excess per tick stop)
On both machines the excess is about half a tick per tick stop.
From reading the code (not bisected), I think the cause is that
cf6444c3e1bb7 ("tick/sched: Unify idle cputime accounting") made
dyntick-idle time and tick-sampled time share cpustat[CPUTIME_IDLE].
On idle exit, kcpustat_dyntick_stop() accounts idle time up to now.
The tick is then restarted on its old period, and the first tick
accounts a whole TICK_NSEC through account_process_tick(), although
the part of that period before the idle exit has just been accounted
as idle. Before v7.2, /proc/stat read ts->idle_sleeptime, and the tick
fed a counter it did not use, so nothing was counted twice.
I have a fix that records the overlap in kcpustat_dyntick_stop() and
leaves it out of the first tick. With it, idle per wall second is
1.0000 on both machines, and -0.1% under the wakeup load at 280 tick
stops/s. I am still testing it with IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING and with steal
time in a KVM guest, and will send it when that is done.
#regzbot introduced: cf6444c3e1bb7
Stian
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-04 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-04 14:27 Stian Halseth [this message]
2026-10-04 18:47 ` [PATCH] sched/cputime: Don't account idle time twice after dyntick-idle Stian Halseth
2026-10-05 4:25 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-10-05 11:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261004142724.3896396-1-stian@itx.no \
--to=stian@itx.no \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®