mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"Takahiro Kuwano" <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>
Cc: "Steam Lin" <STLin2@winbond.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/17] mtd: spi-nor: Fix WRSR with ODTR chips
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 21:43:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261004214323.D71CB1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261004-winbond-master-spi-nor-w35t-v2-7-592f3300a70f@bootlin.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mtd: spi-nor: rejecting len != 1 in Octal DTR mode breaks 2-byte SR writes
- [High] mtd: spi-nor: hardware WEL state leak on early return in spi_nor_write_sr_ll()
--

commit 101ce767bdad155741f87e7d7cf56f7779db6402
Author: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

mtd: spi-nor: Fix WRSR with ODTR chips

The ODTR interface requires an even number of bytes in each section of
the operation. spi_nor_spimem_setup_op() takes care of the opcode phase,
but we have to adapt the rest of the operation ourself.

> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index cf23094021daa..381bbc13f82ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -791,6 +791,17 @@ static int spi_nor_write_sr_ll(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode, const u8 *sr,
>  	if (nor->spimem) {
>  		struct spi_mem_op op = SPI_NOR_WRSR_OP(opcode,
>  						       nor->bouncebuf, len);
> +		if (nor->reg_proto == SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR) {
> +			if (len != 1)
> +				return -EOPNOTSUPP;

[Severity: High]
Does this erroneously reject legitimate 2-byte register writes required for
DTR-enabled chips?

Looking at spi_nor_write_sr1_and_sr2(), it passes len = 2 to
spi_nor_write_sr_ll(), which is now broken by this check.

This propagates -EOPNOTSUPP out to userspace via spi_nor_sr_unlock(), resulting
in a visible regression where Software Write Protection unlocking and flash
configuration fails for 8-8-8 DTR chips.

[Severity: High]
Does returning early here leave the Write Enable Latch (WEL) persistently active
on the flash device?

Since spi_nor_write_sr_ll() calls spi_nor_write_enable(nor) earlier in the
function, this early return happens without executing the SPI command that would
naturally clear it. Leaving the hardware write-enabled risks accidental data
corruption from stray writes.

> +
> +			/*
> +			 * We don't want to write only one byte in DTR mode. So,
> +			 * duplicate the buffer and write 2.
> +			 */
> +			op.data.nbytes = 2;
> +			nor->bouncebuf[1] = nor->bouncebuf[0];
> +		}
>  
>  		spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, nor->reg_proto);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004-winbond-master-spi-nor-w35t-v2-0-592f3300a70f@bootlin.com?part=7

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-04 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-04 21:31 [PATCH v2 00/17] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Add support for the W35TxxNW family Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] mtd: spi-nor: Only switch to ODTR if the chip has a callback for it Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] mtd: spi-nor: swp: Fix SR2 initialization Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] mtd: spi-nor: Fix spacing between arguments Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] mtd: spi-nor: Fix comment indentation to clarify the intent Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] mtd: spi-nor: sfdp: Enhance a comment Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] mtd: spi-nor: Drop stale values Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] mtd: spi-nor: Fix WRSR with ODTR chips Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:43   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] mtd: spi-nor: Allow configuring the actual number of dummy cycles Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] mtd: spi-nor: Fix SWP for octal DTR chips Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Prepare the introduction of W35TxxNW parts Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Add support for W35T64NW-C Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Add support for W35T12NW-C Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Add support for W35T25NW-C/E Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Add support for W35T51NW-C/E Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Add support for W35T01NW-C/E Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Add support for W35T02NW-C/E Miquel Raynal
2026-10-04 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] mtd: spi-nor: Fix the meaning of a comment Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261004214323.D71CB1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=STLin2@winbond.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®