From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: Implement support for BTI veneers
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 13:05:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261005110511.157016-4-ardb+git@google.com> (raw)
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
[ Resending this with minimal changes even though some other approaches
were proposed as well. [1][2] Neither of those are appropriate for
backporting, while this series can reasonably be applied to older
kernels. ]
Recent toolchains will omit BTI landing pads from functions with static
linkage that never have their address taken. If a landing pad is needed
nonetheless, it is up to the static linker to emit a BTI veneer withing
direct branching range of the target, and direct the call to the veneer
instead.
Modules are partially linked objects, and so there is no static linker
that can do this for us. Instead, the module loader must see to this.
So implement this for the arm64 module loader. Patch #2 contains a test
module that was used to validate the approach.
Changes since v1:
- make HAVE_LIVE_PATCH depend on !ARM64_BTI_KERNEL, as live patch has
other cases where landing pads may go missing
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1786768375.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260822135323.795946-11-ardb+git@google.com/
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Ard Biesheuvel (2):
arm64: module: Emit BTI veneers for cross-section calls
DONOTMERGE: arm64: module: Test module for BTI veneers
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 7 +-
arch/arm64/include/asm/module.h | 12 ++
arch/arm64/include/asm/module.lds.h | 3 +
arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/bti_veneer_test.c | 26 ++++
arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++-
6 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/bti_veneer_test.c
--
2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7-goog
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 11:05 Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2026-10-05 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: module: Emit BTI veneers for cross-section calls Ard Biesheuvel
2026-10-05 15:07 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-05 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] DONOTMERGE: arm64: module: Test module for BTI veneers Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261005110511.157016-4-ardb+git@google.com \
--to=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®