From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9169237B022; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 21:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791235291; cv=none; b=BeffZqt/syx9LaEgxXw2ab0aV9YmvXeNVTLqkpdijCvqVhH1kPq1ML9SYaHPs+crxdKHSr+f9jH3cpY9Th6DwXwxMFgGUBQaAI3E9gi0wFfpaHKO3xDfPIw3aAcOOStv31wyBxLEXWKA5yYQ2547bmktAFL56ODEcF1JoptMTkk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791235291; c=relaxed/simple; bh=thdx6/Tpa0kdL9sBRWX8zSc2G2OSo1LDXdbpbRaiO30=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JcsTtjDNCMDCRjR0upiErgAA7O7wcH/a04/ELPJOv6tpY0nw9/KolX/xCkwBjb+ouX+GrOmea+c1ZjsQJXTwqSTu7ZpqWLOcECgdeQYydNkNxdv/s21LA5BY55oCmg2MH9qVLMKLTmAEfv/VQYW29g5l9KKTmALe72fVNnE8IQg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QBA8PLkP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QBA8PLkP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0E641F000FF; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 21:21:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791235290; bh=thdx6/Tpa0kdL9sBRWX8zSc2G2OSo1LDXdbpbRaiO30=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=QBA8PLkPqSJSp950kcjaLgOMRvgZf6jra9tnaq9ySSYHZoQtNwaQEOCqgUQMsfoes 3yCqaxVDCn6E6GdSndHK7GAWLMvz5w4hYp1tREz2ATEtDo3eWe10FP4tOaDA/L6GmD FdY/gOwfAODqGgC7o6v2FFoS90s8LpgbP6Sz33w10H9G9srezEJQOOzBBrX74wezPx JzSQa9Gd5Tf0LMGpzpfwHXYXJYPa4dYYOVbxZA1t5GCME3WKgnA4TVVLxsiYon5lYX F2qZwmSeJm8frmTO+dFm6u1spnqI6NNK9sVAFDog368TqxERYXqTDrT0nv3SLzExlC KPKl0EH2P9lWQ== Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 14:21:28 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sasha Levin Cc: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org, "Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric)" , stable@vger.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim , Cong Wang , Jiri Pirko , "David S. Miller" , "Samudrala, Sridhar" , John Fastabend , Benjamin Robin , Thomas Petazzoni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Victor Nogueira , Pedro Tammela , Simon Horman Subject: Re: netdev LLM review for backports (WAS: [PATCH 5.10.y] net: sched: cls_u32: Undo tcf_bind_filter if u32_replace_hw_knode) Message-ID: <20261005142128.30f80c5b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20261005-cve-2023-53733-v1-1-d716b944802c@bootlin.com> <179119639380.1402591.2155637888002963@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 5 Oct 2026 10:00:46 -0400 Sasha Levin wrote: > I started seeing these reviews on proposed backports of net/ commits, and while > they are REALLY great for upstream commits, I do not think that these comments > make sense in the context of a backport. Blah, sorry about that. Let me add a regex on the tags to exclude patches with 5.x/6.x/7.x