From: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list),
llvm@lists.linux.dev (open list:CLANG/LLVM BUILD
SUPPORT:Keyword:\b(?i:clang|llvm)\b)
Subject: [PATCH] sparc64: Define p4d_page() instead of stubbing it to NULL
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 13:39:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261005203930.246598-1-rosenp@gmail.com> (raw)
A sparc64 allmodconfig build with LLVM fails in vmalloc_to_page():
mm/vmalloc.c: error: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer
has undefined behavior [-Werror,-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
sparc64 defines p4d_page() as NULL, on the assumption that it is only
used by stubbed out hugetlb gup code. Generic code now uses it in
vmalloc_to_page(), ptdump and KASAN. In vmalloc_to_page() the NULL is
used in pointer arithmetic, which clang diagnoses even though the
branch is unreachable on sparc64.
Define p4d_page() in terms of p4d_pgtable(), the same way pud_page() is
defined in terms of pud_pgtable(). sparc64 has no p4d leaf mappings, so
there is no functional change.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
index 35a217bf6e5c..c5eff6efe514 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
@@ -850,8 +850,7 @@ static inline pmd_t *pud_pgtable(pud_t pud)
#define p4d_present(p4d) (p4d_val(p4d) != 0U)
#define p4d_clear(p4dp) (p4d_val(*(p4dp)) = 0UL)
-/* only used by the stubbed out hugetlb gup code, should never be called */
-#define p4d_page(p4d) NULL
+#define p4d_page(p4d) virt_to_page((void *)p4d_pgtable(p4d))
#define pud_leaf pud_leaf
static inline bool pud_leaf(pud_t pud)
--
2.56.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 20:39 Rosen Penev [this message]
2026-10-06 7:59 ` Kjetil Oftedal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261005203930.246598-1-rosenp@gmail.com \
--to=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®