From: Beomseok Kim <dilddream31@gmail.com>
To: emmanuel.fleury@u-bordeaux.fr
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, airlied@gmail.com,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
simona@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix NULL pointer dereference in nouveau_fence_sync() when prev->cli == NULL
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 18:58:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261006095841.35167-1-dilddream31@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1690ea65-a1e0-4a34-bde1-bdd26e31c6c4@u-bordeaux.fr>
Hi Emmanuel,
I have been looking into what appears to be the same NULL dereference in
nouveau_fence_sync(), and I found a path that may explain how prev->cli
ends up NULL.
In the failure I traced, nouveau_fence_no_signaling() removes the fence
from the pending list, but leaves fence->channel pointing to the channel.
The fence itself can remain alive through a BO reservation. After the
channel is torn down, the same fence can later be encountered again in
nouveau_fence_sync() through that stale channel association.
The normal nouveau_fence_signal() path clears fence->channel when removing
the fence from the pending list, so the no-signaling path appears
asymmetric here.
I also did not find a normal path that explicitly sets channel->cli to
NULL while keeping the channel valid. If this is the path leading to the
crash, checking prev->cli here would prevent the dereference, but the stale
fence->channel association would still remain.
The existing fence/channel lifetime handling seems to rely on clearing
fence->channel once the fence is detached from the channel. If that is the
intended invariant, preserving it in the no-signaling path seems preferable
to allowing a non-NULL fence->channel to refer to a torn-down channel.
I sent a separate patch that clears fence->channel in
nouveau_fence_no_signaling():
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Clear fence channel in no-signaling path
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260928081450.19340-1-dilddream31@gmail.com
Thanks,
Beomseok
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 10:06 Emmanuel Fleury
2026-10-06 9:58 ` Beomseok Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261006095841.35167-1-dilddream31@gmail.com \
--to=dilddream31@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=emmanuel.fleury@u-bordeaux.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®