mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Beomseok Kim <dilddream31@gmail.com>
To: emmanuel.fleury@u-bordeaux.fr
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, airlied@gmail.com,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
	simona@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix NULL pointer dereference in nouveau_fence_sync() when prev->cli == NULL
Date: Tue,  6 Oct 2026 18:58:41 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261006095841.35167-1-dilddream31@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1690ea65-a1e0-4a34-bde1-bdd26e31c6c4@u-bordeaux.fr>

Hi Emmanuel,

I have been looking into what appears to be the same NULL dereference in
nouveau_fence_sync(), and I found a path that may explain how prev->cli
ends up NULL.

In the failure I traced, nouveau_fence_no_signaling() removes the fence
from the pending list, but leaves fence->channel pointing to the channel.
The fence itself can remain alive through a BO reservation. After the
channel is torn down, the same fence can later be encountered again in
nouveau_fence_sync() through that stale channel association.

The normal nouveau_fence_signal() path clears fence->channel when removing
the fence from the pending list, so the no-signaling path appears
asymmetric here.

I also did not find a normal path that explicitly sets channel->cli to
NULL while keeping the channel valid. If this is the path leading to the
crash, checking prev->cli here would prevent the dereference, but the stale
fence->channel association would still remain.

The existing fence/channel lifetime handling seems to rely on clearing
fence->channel once the fence is detached from the channel. If that is the
intended invariant, preserving it in the no-signaling path seems preferable
to allowing a non-NULL fence->channel to refer to a torn-down channel.

I sent a separate patch that clears fence->channel in
nouveau_fence_no_signaling():

  [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Clear fence channel in no-signaling path
  https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260928081450.19340-1-dilddream31@gmail.com

Thanks,
Beomseok

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-06  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-23 10:06 Emmanuel Fleury
2026-10-06  9:58 ` Beomseok Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261006095841.35167-1-dilddream31@gmail.com \
    --to=dilddream31@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=emmanuel.fleury@u-bordeaux.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®