From: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
To: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] firewire: core: expand close_transaction() into its callers and remove it
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 00:29:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261006152904.GA101743@sakamocchi.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005112544.240552-2-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 08:25:40PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> The return value from close_transaction() is useful only in
> fw_cancel_transaction(). The other caller,
> transmit_complete_callback(), simply discards it.
>
> Additionally, the pending transaction queue should be enumerated as soon
> as possible to prevent the issued transaction from completing.
>
> Expand close_transaction() into its callers, and remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
> ---
> drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c | 66 ++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> ...
> @@ -201,9 +191,6 @@ static void transmit_complete_callback(struct fw_packet *packet,
> packet->speed, status, packet->timestamp);
>
> switch (status) {
> - case ACK_COMPLETE:
> - close_transaction(t, card, RCODE_COMPLETE, packet->timestamp);
> - break;
> case ACK_PENDING:
> {
> unsigned int delta;
> @@ -218,27 +205,36 @@ static void transmit_complete_callback(struct fw_packet *packet,
> // local destination never runs in any type of IRQ context.
> scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &card->transactions.lock)
> start_split_transaction_timeout(t, delta);
> - break;
> + return;
> }
> + case ACK_COMPLETE:
> + status = RCODE_COMPLETE;
> + break;
> case ACK_BUSY_X:
> case ACK_BUSY_A:
> case ACK_BUSY_B:
> - close_transaction(t, card, RCODE_BUSY, packet->timestamp);
> + status = RCODE_BUSY;
> break;
> case ACK_DATA_ERROR:
> - close_transaction(t, card, RCODE_DATA_ERROR, packet->timestamp);
> + status = RCODE_DATA_ERROR;
> break;
> case ACK_TYPE_ERROR:
> - close_transaction(t, card, RCODE_TYPE_ERROR, packet->timestamp);
> + status = RCODE_TYPE_ERROR;
> break;
> default:
> - /*
> - * In this case the ack is really a juju specific
> - * rcode, so just forward that to the callback.
> - */
> - close_transaction(t, card, status, packet->timestamp);
> + // In this case the ack is really a juju specific rcode, so just forward that to
> + // the callback.
> break;
> }
> +
> + // NOTE: This can be without irqsave when we can guarantee that __fw_send_request() for
> + // local destination never runs in any type of IRQ context.
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &card->transactions.lock) {
> + if (!find_and_pop_transaction_entry(card, iter == t))
> + return;
> + }
I realized that this expansion has a bug to suppress the following
callback, since the condition 'iter == t' includes the local variable 't'
while 'find_and_pop_transaction_entry()' macro initiates the 't' with NULL
for its internal use. When receiving one of the above error acknowledge
codes (e.g. RCODE_GENERATION at bus reset),
'find_and_pop_transaction_entry()' is evaluated as NULL, then the above
return statement is executed always.
> + invoke_callback(t, status, packet->timestamp, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> static void fw_fill_request(struct fw_packet *packet, int tcode, int tlabel,
I'll post v2 patch after enough testing.
Regards
Takashi Sakamoto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 11:25 [PATCH 0/5] firewire: core/ohci: defer cancellation callbacks to workqueue Takashi Sakamoto
2026-10-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] firewire: core: expand close_transaction() into its callers and remove it Takashi Sakamoto
2026-10-06 15:29 ` Takashi Sakamoto [this message]
2026-10-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] firewire: ohci: schedule callback on workqueue when cancelling AT request packet Takashi Sakamoto
2026-10-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] firewire: ohci: allow AT local packet cancellation Takashi Sakamoto
2026-10-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] firewire: core: schedule callback when cancelling pending transactions Takashi Sakamoto
2026-10-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] firewire: core: fulfill kerneldoc for fw_cancel_transaction() Takashi Sakamoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261006152904.GA101743@sakamocchi.jp \
--to=o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®