From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
"Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: page_alloc: make defrag_mode retries follow the promoted order
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 16:41:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261006164122.ea9a673b336b8ac74725c35c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006091815.897133-1-kirill@shutemov.name>
On Tue, 6 Oct 2026 10:18:13 +0100 Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
> From: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
>
> Since commit 7e8756d7ad22 ("mm: page_alloc: fix non-movable reclaim
> storm in defrag_mode"), direct reclaim and compaction for non-movable
> requests under defrag_mode run at pageblock_order, to produce the whole
> blocks that ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT needs. The retry decisions that follow
> still use the request order. An order-0 request can therefore retry
> indefinitely without ever reaching the ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT fallback:
>
> ...
>
> In a VM reproducer (32G, defrag_mode, inode churn under memory.low):
>
> before after
> should_reclaim_retry() calls 63M 293k
> peak memory pressure (PSI some avg10) 99% 12%
>
> File creation runs 5.7x faster.
> Fixes: 7e8756d7ad22 ("mm: page_alloc: fix non-movable reclaim storm in defrag_mode")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2:
> - keep the compaction priority floor and the COMPACT_SUCCESS retry
> limit on the request order, so non-costly requests still escalate to
> SYNC_FULL before falling back (Harry Yoo, Johannes Weiner)
> - compute the promoted order once in __alloc_pages_slowpath() and pass
> it to direct reclaim, direct compaction and the retry helpers, instead
> of each of them deriving it (Harry Yoo)
Thanks. That's a fairly large update. v2 diff is below.
Are we sure about cc:stable? Or even 7.3-rcX? It's a pretty big
change.
mm/page_alloc.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~a
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4139,8 +4139,9 @@ out:
* For those, promote the order of reclaim and compaction to help make
* blocks, instead of spinning in reclaim alone unproductively. Retry
* decisions based on the outcome of that work - reclaim progress and
- * compaction results - must account for the promotion as well, see
- * should_reclaim_retry() and should_compact_retry().
+ * compaction results - must account for the promotion as well, so
+ * __alloc_pages_slowpath() computes the promoted order once and passes
+ * it alongside the request order.
*/
static inline unsigned int nofrag_promote_order(unsigned int order,
unsigned int alloc_flags,
@@ -4162,8 +4163,9 @@ static inline unsigned int nofrag_promot
/* Try memory compaction for high-order allocations before reclaim */
static struct page *
__alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
- unsigned int alloc_flags, const struct alloc_context *ac,
- enum compact_priority prio, enum compact_result *compact_result)
+ unsigned int compact_order, unsigned int alloc_flags,
+ const struct alloc_context *ac, enum compact_priority prio,
+ enum compact_result *compact_result)
{
struct page *page = NULL;
unsigned long pflags;
@@ -4174,7 +4176,6 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_m
.order = order,
.page = NULL,
};
- unsigned int compact_order = nofrag_promote_order(order, alloc_flags, ac);
if (!compact_order)
return NULL;
@@ -4256,7 +4257,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_m
static inline bool
should_compact_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, struct alloc_context *ac, int order,
- int alloc_flags,
+ int compact_order, int alloc_flags,
enum compact_result compact_result,
enum compact_priority *compact_priority,
int *compaction_retries)
@@ -4266,10 +4267,7 @@ should_compact_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, str
bool ret = false;
int retries = *compaction_retries;
enum compact_priority priority = *compact_priority;
- unsigned int compact_order;
- /* Check the compaction result at the order compaction ran at */
- compact_order = nofrag_promote_order(order, alloc_flags, ac);
if (!compact_order)
return false;
@@ -4304,7 +4302,7 @@ should_compact_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, str
* need much more detailed feedback from compaction to
* make a better decision.
*/
- if (compact_order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
+ if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
max_retries /= 4;
if (++(*compaction_retries) <= max_retries) {
@@ -4316,7 +4314,7 @@ should_compact_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, str
/*
* Compaction failed. Retry with increasing priority.
*/
- min_priority = (compact_order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) ?
+ min_priority = (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) ?
MIN_COMPACT_COSTLY_PRIORITY : MIN_COMPACT_PRIORITY;
if (*compact_priority > min_priority) {
@@ -4331,8 +4329,9 @@ out:
#else
static inline struct page *
__alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
- unsigned int alloc_flags, const struct alloc_context *ac,
- enum compact_priority prio, enum compact_result *compact_result)
+ unsigned int compact_order, unsigned int alloc_flags,
+ const struct alloc_context *ac, enum compact_priority prio,
+ enum compact_result *compact_result)
{
*compact_result = COMPACT_SKIPPED;
return NULL;
@@ -4340,7 +4339,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_m
static inline bool
should_compact_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, struct alloc_context *ac, int order,
- int alloc_flags,
+ int compact_order, int alloc_flags,
enum compact_result compact_result,
enum compact_priority *compact_priority,
int *compaction_retries)
@@ -4479,13 +4478,12 @@ __perform_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsign
/* The really slow allocator path where we enter direct reclaim */
static inline struct page *
__alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
- unsigned int alloc_flags, const struct alloc_context *ac,
- unsigned long *did_some_progress)
+ unsigned int reclaim_order, unsigned int alloc_flags,
+ const struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned long *did_some_progress)
{
struct page *page = NULL;
unsigned long pflags;
bool drained = false;
- unsigned int reclaim_order = nofrag_promote_order(order, alloc_flags, ac);
psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
*did_some_progress = __perform_reclaim(gfp_mask, reclaim_order, ac);
@@ -4651,8 +4649,9 @@ bool gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_t gfp_ma
*/
static inline bool
should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order,
- struct alloc_context *ac, int alloc_flags,
- bool did_some_progress, int *no_progress_loops)
+ unsigned int reclaim_order, struct alloc_context *ac,
+ int alloc_flags, bool did_some_progress,
+ int *no_progress_loops)
{
struct zone *zone;
struct zoneref *z;
@@ -4671,7 +4670,7 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, uns
* whether the request itself could succeed after reclaim.
*/
if (did_some_progress && order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER &&
- nofrag_promote_order(order, alloc_flags, ac) == order)
+ reclaim_order == order)
*no_progress_loops = 0;
else
(*no_progress_loops)++;
@@ -4811,6 +4810,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, u
const bool costly_order = order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER;
struct page *page = NULL;
unsigned int alloc_flags;
+ unsigned int reclaim_order;
unsigned long did_some_progress;
enum compact_priority compact_priority;
enum compact_result compact_result;
@@ -4955,17 +4955,22 @@ retry:
/* If allocation has taken excessively long, warn about it */
check_alloc_stall_warn(gfp_mask, ac->nodemask, order, alloc_start_time);
+ /* The order reclaim and compaction work at, see nofrag_promote_order() */
+ reclaim_order = nofrag_promote_order(order, alloc_flags, ac);
+
/* Try direct reclaim and then allocating */
if (!compact_first) {
- page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags,
- ac, &did_some_progress);
+ page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order, reclaim_order,
+ alloc_flags, ac,
+ &did_some_progress);
if (page)
goto got_pg;
}
/* Try direct compaction and then allocating */
- page = __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
- compact_priority, &compact_result);
+ page = __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_mask, order, reclaim_order,
+ alloc_flags, ac, compact_priority,
+ &compact_result);
if (page)
goto got_pg;
@@ -5017,8 +5022,9 @@ retry:
check_retry_zonelist(zonelist_iter_cookie))
goto restart;
- if (should_reclaim_retry(gfp_mask, order, ac, alloc_flags,
- did_some_progress > 0, &no_progress_loops))
+ if (should_reclaim_retry(gfp_mask, order, reclaim_order, ac,
+ alloc_flags, did_some_progress > 0,
+ &no_progress_loops))
goto retry;
/*
@@ -5028,8 +5034,8 @@ retry:
* of free memory (see __compaction_suitable)
*/
if (did_some_progress > 0 && can_compact &&
- should_compact_retry(gfp_mask, ac, order, alloc_flags,
- compact_result, &compact_priority,
+ should_compact_retry(gfp_mask, ac, order, reclaim_order,
+ alloc_flags, compact_result, &compact_priority,
&compaction_retries))
goto retry;
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 9:18 Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-10-06 23:41 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-10-07 13:01 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-10-07 18:32 ` Andrew Morton
2026-10-07 15:53 ` Usama Arif
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261006164122.ea9a673b336b8ac74725c35c@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®