From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
"Tushar Dave" <tdave@nvidia.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Chaitanya Kulkarni" <kch@nvidia.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex@shazbot.org>,
"Ankit Agrawal" <ankita@nvidia.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 08/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Relaxed Ordering Completions directly
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 17:21:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261006222109.GA719055@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-fix-p2p-acs-v4-0-v9-8-1a8e0f50ddd9@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 02:55:16PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>
> ACS P2P Completion Redirect leaves Completions carrying the Relaxed
> Ordering attribute alone. PCIe r7.0 sec 6.12.1.1 redirects only those "that
> do not have the Relaxed Ordering Attribute bit set", and sec 7.7.12.5
> describes the enable bit as "applicable only to Completions whose Relaxed
> Ordering Attribute is clear". P2PDMA reports one answer for every kind of
> TLP, so a client whose provider returns such Completions is sent through
> the host bridge for a redirect that never happens to it.
I guess pci_acs_p2pdma_completion() returned PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_REDIRECT
even for RO Completions? But that didn't change the hardware
behavior -- maybe the caller *thought* Completions were routed through
the host bridge, but they actually weren't.
I kind of lost the plot here. What does the caller do with this
information? I don't think a device is *required* to set RO even when
it is enabled, and it may set RO on some transactions but not others.
> Add enum pci_p2pdma_tlp_flags and let a caller state that property.
>
> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> Tested-by: Tushar Dave <tdave@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/p2pdma.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> index 43e225cc5735..1fadef6d0609 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> @@ -544,11 +544,15 @@ pci_acs_p2pdma_request(u16 ctrl, unsigned int tlp_flags)
> /*
> * Decide how a peer-to-peer Completion at an ACS-capable ingress port routes.
> * PCIe r7.0 sec 6.12.1.1: no ACS control other than P2P Completion Redirect
> - * affects a Completion.
> + * affects a Completion, and that one leaves Completions carrying the Relaxed
> + * Ordering attribute alone.
> */
> static enum pci_acs_p2pdma_state
> pci_acs_p2pdma_completion(u16 ctrl, unsigned int tlp_flags)
> {
> + if (tlp_flags & PCI_P2PDMA_TLP_RELAXED_CPL)
> + return PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_DIRECT;
> +
> return ctrl & PCI_ACS_CR ? PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_REDIRECT :
> PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_DIRECT;
> }
>
> --
> 2.55.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 11:55 [PATCH v9 00/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document the TLP attribute assumptions Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Derive routing from directional ACS controls Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 20:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 6:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] PCI: Reject unreadable ACS controls in isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate ACS controls at the path divergence Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document directional ACS routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Collect the path's ACS controls before deciding Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Answer routing per TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Relaxed Ordering Completions directly Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 22:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Reject Translated Requests blocked by Translation Blocking Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Translated Requests under Direct Translated P2P Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 22:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Log detailed ACS routing diagnostics Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Add KUnit tests for the ACS routing decisions Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the ACS P2P routing walk Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] PCI: Add KUnit coverage for ACS isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document TLP-class routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate the ATS path for clients with ATS enabled Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the routing of " Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 19:29 ` [PATCH v9 00/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-06 21:22 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 6:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261006222109.GA719055@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tdave@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®