From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Mario Peter <mario.peter@leica-geosystems.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] driver core: Take parent lock in async device attach
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 16:38:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026100658-stoic-unread-22c6@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006132335.4014316-1-mario.peter@leica-geosystems.com>
On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 01:23:35PM +0000, Mario Peter wrote:
> On buses with need_parent_lock set (only USB), probe() must run with the
> parent device locked. A synchronous attach after device_add() gets this
> from the caller, e.g. usb_set_configuration() holds the udev lock while
> adding interfaces. __device_attach_async_helper() runs the probe from an
> async worker instead, where that lock isn't held, and only takes
> device_lock(dev).
>
> With async probing enabled for USB drivers (driver_async_probe=*,
> module.async_probe=1), hub_probe() of a multi-TT hub then races with
> usb_set_configuration() and both create the interface's endpoint
> devices. On an i.MX8MM board this hit 11 of 100 boots:
>
> sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '.../1-1/1-1:1.0/ep_81'
> Call trace:
> sysfs_warn_dup
> usb_create_ep_devs
> create_intf_ep_devs
> usb_set_interface
> hub_probe
> usb_probe_interface
> really_probe
> __device_attach_async_helper
> async_run_entry_fn
>
> Take the parent lock there as well, like __driver_attach_async_helper()
> does, and move __device_driver_lock/unlock() up for that. With this the
> warning was gone in 300 boots.
>
> Fixes: 765230b5f084 ("driver-core: add asynchronous probing support for drivers")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Mario Peter <mario.peter@leica-geosystems.com>
> ---
> Seen and tested on 6.16.y, which has the same code here. On mainline
> only build-tested.
Please verify this on the latest tree, 6.16.y is _VERY_ old and
obsolete, lots has changed in the year it was released.
> Not covered: deferred_probe_work_func() also re-probes via
> __device_attach() without the parent lock.
>
> Analysis and patch done with the help of Claude Code.
This feels really wrong, what bus is the host controller on for these?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 13:23 Mario Peter
2026-10-06 14:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-10-06 15:29 ` PETER Mario
2026-10-06 20:45 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026100658-stoic-unread-22c6@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.peter@leica-geosystems.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®