From: Timo Joannin <timo.joannin@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
Jennifer Guo <guojy.bj@gmail.com>,
Timo Joannin <timo.joannin@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: rename struct phy_status_rpt_8192cd_t to rtl8723bs_phy_status_rpt.
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 11:07:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261007090736.277636-2-timo.joannin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007090736.277636-1-timo.joannin@gmail.com>
The struct identifier references the 8192CD chip while being in a
rtl8723bs codebase. Additionally, the identifier uses the _t suffix,
while being generally reserved for typedef identifiers.
Rename the struct to rtl8723bs_phy_status_rpt
across the rtl8723bs codebase to accurately
reflect the driver and clean up the naming.
Signed-off-by: Timo Joannin <timo.joannin@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c | 3 ++-
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c
index 34b0369a7936..bf2479c01873 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ static void odm_rx_phy_status_parsing(struct dm_odm_t *dm_odm,
bool is_cck_rate = false;
u8 rf_rx_num = 0;
u8 lna_idx, vga_idx;
- struct phy_status_rpt_8192cd_t *phy_sta_rpt = (struct phy_status_rpt_8192cd_t *)phy_status;
+ struct rtl8723bs_phy_status_rpt *phy_sta_rpt =
+ (struct rtl8723bs_phy_status_rpt *)phy_status;
is_cck_rate = pkt_info->data_rate <= DESC_RATE11M;
phy_info->rx_mimo_signal_quality[RF_PATH_A] = -1;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.h
index ca3380328a72..ae010cae9dd7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.h
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ struct phy_rx_agc_info_t {
#endif
};
-struct phy_status_rpt_8192cd_t {
+struct rtl8723bs_phy_status_rpt {
struct phy_rx_agc_info_t path_agc[2];
u8 ch_corr[2];
u8 cck_sig_qual_ofdm_pwdb_all;
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 9:07 [PATCH v4 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: struct rename and cast unwind Timo Joannin
2026-10-07 9:07 ` Timo Joannin [this message]
2026-10-07 9:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: unwind cast mess and remove phy_stat struct Timo Joannin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261007090736.277636-2-timo.joannin@gmail.com \
--to=timo.joannin@gmail.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guojy.bj@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®