From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Amir Ayupov <aaupov@fb.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] coresight: etm4x: Report whether the PMU counts external output 1
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 17:24:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261007162406.GA26205@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001063744.2143819-1-aaupov@fb.com>
Hi Amir,
Thanks for the patch. I have a few initial comments below. We may have
further feedback after our internal review.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 11:37:43PM -0700, Amir Ayupov wrote:
[...]
> #define CS_CFG_MATCH_CLASS_SRC_ALL 0x0001 /* match any source */
> #define CS_CFG_MATCH_CLASS_SRC_ETM4 0x0002 /* match any ETMv4 device */
> +/* ETM external output 1 is countable by the PMU as TRCEXTOUT1 */
> +#define CS_CFG_MATCH_CAP_PMU_EXTOUT1 0x0004
Do we need to tie this capability to TRCEXTOUT1? For example, Neoverse
V2 exposes TRCEXTOUT0 through TRCEXTOUT3 as PMU events.
> /* flags defining device instance matching - used in config match desc data. */
> #define CS_CFG_MATCH_INST_ANY 0x80000000 /* any instance of a class */
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c
> index e1a59b4345052..2847d2d7f7bed 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c
> @@ -174,9 +174,14 @@ static int etm4_cfg_load_feature(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>
> int etm4_cscfg_register(struct coresight_device *csdev)
> {
> + struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
> struct cscfg_csdev_feat_ops ops;
> + u32 match_flags = CS_CFG_ETM4_MATCH_FLAGS;
>
> ops.load_feat = &etm4_cfg_load_feature;
>
> - return cscfg_register_csdev(csdev, CS_CFG_ETM4_MATCH_FLAGS, &ops);
> + if (drvdata->pmu_extout1)
> + match_flags |= CS_CFG_MATCH_CAP_PMU_EXTOUT1;
> +
> + return cscfg_register_csdev(csdev, match_flags, &ops);
The current matching logic succeeds if a device and feature share any
flag bit. If the feature sets both CS_CFG_MATCH_CLASS_SRC_ETM4 and
CS_CFG_MATCH_CAP_PMU_EXTOUT1, it will still load on an ETM4 device that
lacks the capability.
Could we check the capability separately when loading the feature,
perhaps in cscfg_load_feat_csdev(), and skip it on unsupported devices?
> +static bool etm4_pmu_has_extout1(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> +{
> + int pmuver = read_pmuver();
> +
> + if (!is_midr_in_range_list(etm4_pmu_extout1_cpus))
> + return false;
Based on specific CPU variant, we should already have identified
TRCEXTOUT has supported.
So either we only base on MIDR list or we can figure out a reliable
way to detect the feature dynamically.
> +
> + /* PMCEID0_EL0[63:32] describe events 0x4000-0x401f from PMUv3p1 */
> + if (!pmuv3_implemented(pmuver) || pmuver < ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P1)
> + return false;
> + if (!(read_pmceid0() & BIT_ULL(32 + ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_TRCEXTOUT1 -
> + ARMV8_PMUV3_EXT_COMMON_EVENT_BASE)))
> + return false;
> +
> + /* nr_event is TRCIDR0.NUMEVENT, the number of events minus one */
> + return drvdata->nr_event >= 1;
> +}
[...]
> @@ -1116,6 +1116,13 @@ int cscfg_csdev_enable_active_config(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>
> if (err)
> cscfg_config_desc_put(config_desc);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * The configuration is active but was not loaded on this
> + * device, for example because the device lacks a capability
> + * its features require. Fail rather than trace without it.
> + */
> + err = -EINVAL;
> }
This fixes a pre-existing issue. It is worther to put it in a separate
patch with fixes tag:
An early return would also avoid the normal enable path's indentation:
if (!config_csdev_active)
return -EINVAL;
err = cscfg_csdev_enable_config(config_csdev_active, preset);
...
Thanks,
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 6:37 Amir Ayupov
2026-10-01 6:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] coresight: Add pmu_pulse/extout_pulse Amir Ayupov
2026-10-07 16:24 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-10-08 8:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] coresight: etm4x: Report whether the PMU counts external output 1 James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261007162406.GA26205@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=aaupov@fb.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®