mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/8] rcutorture: Add atomic SRCU lockdep support
Date: Wed,  7 Oct 2026 14:04:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261007210408.1983713-5-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9cb7abd-db60-43f6-9392-27fe29abb75b@paulmck-laptop>

From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>

Add three testtypes covering atomic SRCU lockdep behavior:

  testtype 4: atomic SRCU same-type deadlock
  testtype 5: atomic SRCU + raw spinlock dependency cycle
  testtype 6: synchronize_srcu_atomic() inside rcu_read_lock()

Co-developed-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 51ed35f5aab17..35dc61d871b98 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -4662,6 +4662,17 @@ static DECLARE_RWSEM(rwsem7);
 static DECLARE_RWSEM(rwsem8);
 static DECLARE_RWSEM(rwsem9);
 
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(spin0);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(spin1);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(spin2);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(spin3);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(spin4);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(spin5);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(spin6);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(spin7);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(spin8);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(spin9);
+
 DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(srcu0);
 DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(srcu1);
 DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(srcu2);
@@ -4673,6 +4684,17 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(srcu7);
 DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(srcu8);
 DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(srcu9);
 
+DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC(srcu0_atomic);
+DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC(srcu1_atomic);
+DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC(srcu2_atomic);
+DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC(srcu3_atomic);
+DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC(srcu4_atomic);
+DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC(srcu5_atomic);
+DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC(srcu6_atomic);
+DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC(srcu7_atomic);
+DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC(srcu8_atomic);
+DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC(srcu9_atomic);
+
 static int srcu_lockdep_next(const char *f, const char *fl, const char *fs, const char *fu, int i,
 			     int cyclelen, int deadlock)
 {
@@ -4702,6 +4724,12 @@ static void rcu_torture_init_srcu_lockdep(void)
 					  &rwsem5, &rwsem6, &rwsem7, &rwsem8, &rwsem9 };
 	struct srcu_struct *srcus[] = { &srcu0, &srcu1, &srcu2, &srcu3, &srcu4,
 					&srcu5, &srcu6, &srcu7, &srcu8, &srcu9 };
+	raw_spinlock_t *spins[] = { &spin0, &spin1, &spin2, &spin3, &spin4,
+				    &spin5, &spin6, &spin7, &spin8, &spin9 };
+	struct srcu_struct *srcus_atomic[] = { &srcu0_atomic, &srcu1_atomic, &srcu2_atomic,
+					       &srcu3_atomic, &srcu4_atomic, &srcu5_atomic,
+					       &srcu6_atomic, &srcu7_atomic, &srcu8_atomic,
+					       &srcu9_atomic };
 	int testtype;
 
 	if (!test_srcu_lockdep)
@@ -4812,11 +4840,65 @@ static void rcu_torture_init_srcu_lockdep(void)
 	}
 #endif // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
 
+	if (testtype == 4) {
+		pr_info("%s: test_srcu_lockdep = %05d: SRCU_ATOMIC %d-way %sdeadlock.\n",
+			__func__, test_srcu_lockdep, cyclelen, deadlock ? "" : "non-");
+		if (deadlock && cyclelen == 1)
+			pr_info("%s: Expect hang.\n", __func__);
+		for (i = 0; i < cyclelen; i++) {
+			j = srcu_lockdep_next(__func__, "srcu_read_lock_atomic",
+					      "synchronize_srcu_atomic",
+					      "srcu_read_unlock_atomic", i,
+					      cyclelen, deadlock);
+			idx = srcu_read_lock_atomic(srcus_atomic[i]);
+			if (j >= 0)
+				synchronize_srcu_atomic(srcus_atomic[j]);
+			srcu_read_unlock_atomic(srcus_atomic[i], idx);
+		}
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (testtype == 5) {
+		pr_info("%s: test_srcu_lockdep = %05d: SRCU_ATOMIC/raw_spinlock %d-way %sdeadlock.\n",
+			__func__, test_srcu_lockdep, cyclelen, deadlock ? "" : "non-");
+		for (i = 0; i < cyclelen; i++) {
+			pr_info("%s: srcu_read_lock_atomic(%d), raw_spin_lock(%d), raw_spin_unlock(%d), srcu_read_unlock_atomic(%d)\n",
+				__func__, i, i, i, i);
+			idx = srcu_read_lock_atomic(srcus_atomic[i]);
+			raw_spin_lock(spins[i]);
+			raw_spin_unlock(spins[i]);
+			srcu_read_unlock_atomic(srcus_atomic[i], idx);
+
+			j = srcu_lockdep_next(__func__, "raw_spin_lock",
+					      "synchronize_srcu_atomic",
+					      "raw_spin_unlock", i, cyclelen,
+					      deadlock);
+			raw_spin_lock(spins[i]);
+			if (j >= 0)
+				synchronize_srcu_atomic(srcus_atomic[j]);
+			raw_spin_unlock(spins[i]);
+		}
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (testtype == 6) {
+		pr_info("%s: test_srcu_lockdep = %05d: synchronize_srcu_atomic() inside rcu_read_lock() %d-way.\n",
+			__func__, test_srcu_lockdep, cyclelen);
+		for (i = 0; i < cyclelen; i++) {
+			rcu_read_lock();
+			synchronize_srcu_atomic(srcus_atomic[i]);
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+		}
+		return;
+	}
+
 err_out:
 	pr_info("%s: test_srcu_lockdep = %05d does nothing.\n", __func__, test_srcu_lockdep);
 	pr_info("%s: test_srcu_lockdep = DNNL.\n", __func__);
 	pr_info("%s: D: Deadlock if nonzero.\n", __func__);
-	pr_info("%s: NN: Test number, 0=SRCU, 1=SRCU/mutex, 2=SRCU/rwsem, 3=SRCU/Tasks Trace RCU.\n", __func__);
+	pr_info("%s: NN: Test number, 0=SRCU, 1=SRCU/mutex, 2=SRCU/rwsem, 3=SRCU/Tasks Trace RCU, 4=SRCU_ATOMIC, ",
+		__func__);
+	pr_cont("5=SRCU_ATOMIC/raw_spinlock, 6=synchronize_srcu_atomic inside rcu_read_lock.\n");
 	pr_info("%s: L: Cycle length.\n", __func__);
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU))
 		pr_info("%s: NN=3 disallowed because kernel is built with CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU=n\n", __func__);
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-07 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-07 21:04 [PATCH 0/8] Torture-test updates for v7.4 Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] rcutorture: Fix divide-by-zero with fwd_progress_div=1 Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] rcutorture: Synchronously wait for all rcu_torture_irq() callbacks to complete Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] torture: Allow specifying alternative ssh command to kvm-remote.sh Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] rcutorture: Fix kvm-again.sh re-run failure on ppc64 Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 21:04 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2026-10-07 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] selftests/rcutorture: Wire atomic SRCU into srcu_lockdep.sh Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] selftests/rcutorture: Fix double nerrs count in srcu_lockdep.sh Paul E. McKenney
2026-10-07 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] rcutorture: Add atomic SRCU cross-CPU IRQ context mismatch test Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261007210408.1983713-5-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®