From: Nicola Fiorillo <nicfio@gmail.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] media: v4l2-subdev: Fix NULL dereferences racing with unbind
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 06:25:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008042600.275884-1-nicfio@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
v4l2_device_unregister_subdev() clears sd->v4l2_dev and, through
media_gobj_destroy(), sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev before it unregisters
the sub-device node, and drivers that call media_device_unregister()
first, as vimc does, clear the latter even earlier. subdev_open()
dereferences both pointers, and the EXT_CTRLS ioctls the first one, so a
driver unbind racing with an open or an ioctl on the node oopses. syzbot
hits the open() case by unbinding vimc.
Patch 2/3 of v2, now patch 1, checked the two pointers in subdev_open().
That only narrows the race: the sub-device can be unregistered right
after the check. A patch along the same lines was also posted in [1].
This version takes a different approach: it stops reading the
sub-device's registration state in these file operations and uses the
node's own vdev->v4l2_dev instead, which unregistration never clears.
subdev_open() and the EXT_CTRLS ioctls no longer read a pointer that the
V4L2 core or the driver core clears when a driver is unbound.
What this does not fix is the lifetime of the sub-device and of the
media device when a driver goes away with file handles open, which is
the known limitation Sakari mentioned on v2 [2]. The commit messages say
so.
Changes since v2:
- Patch 1 (was 2/3): use vdev->v4l2_dev->mdev instead of checking
sd->v4l2_dev and sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev, and fail with -ENODEV if
the media device's driver has been unbound meanwhile.
- Patch 2 is new: the same dereference of sd->v4l2_dev in the EXT_CTRLS
ioctls, found by reading the code.
- Dropped the two ipu6 patches of v2 (1/3 and 3/3), as I said I would
in [3].
- Rebased on media next.
Testing:
- Built with W=1 (allmodconfig) at each patch of the series on media
next 8e26d4c20ed2.
- Run in QEMU/KVM (x86_64, 4 vCPUs, KASAN generic inline, vimc built
in) on media next 2dcdfb625c3b, which has the same v4l2-subdev.c,
one boot per 60 s run. 16 threads either open and close vimc's
sub-device nodes, or loop on VIDIOC_G_EXT_CTRLS on handles they keep
open across unbinds, while another thread unbinds and rebinds vimc
through sysfs every 1 or 30 ms. Each oops kills the thread that hits
it; the test re-creates up to 100 per run, so the counts are capped:
kernel open() runs EXT_CTRLS runs
media next 116 + 116 oops -
+ patch 1 0 + 0 116 + 116 oops
+ patches 1 and 2 0 + 0 0 + 0
The oopses are KASAN null-ptr-derefs in subdev_open() and
subdev_do_ioctl() respectively. The EXT_CTRLS runs are not done on
plain media next, since they open the nodes too and would oops in
subdev_open() as well. The open() runs with patch 1 and all the runs
with both patches showed no oops, KASAN report or warning at all:
about 8 million successful opens, 1.1 million opens refused with
-ENODEV while vimc was being unbound (the test does not tell
v4l2_open()'s own check from the new one), and, with both patches,
880 million EXT_CTRLS ioctls.
- Run on the IPU6 tablet where I first hit the open() oops (Intel N100,
Chuwi Hi10 X1), with two GalaxyCore sensors, GC5035 and GC8034, whose
drivers I have not posted yet. Kernel: media next 9cfc1aca0781 plus
those drivers and their ipu-bridge and int3472 changes, with KASAN
(generic inline), lockdep and UBSAN. 4 processes either open and
close every sub-device node, or loop on VIDIOC_G_EXT_CTRLS on the
sensor's node, keeping it open across unbinds, while the sensor's
I2C driver is unbound and rebound 300 times through sysfs. One run
per sensor and test:
kernel open() runs EXT_CTRLS runs
media next oops at the 4th -
unbind of the first
+ patches 1 and 2 0 + 0 0 + 0
On media next the oops is the KASAN null-ptr-deref in subdev_open().
The test stops at the first oops, so the other runs were not done
there, and the tablet gives no before and after for patch 2. With
both patches: 2.9 million successful opens, 1048 refused with
-ENODEV (again from either check), 81 million EXT_CTRLS ioctls, and
v4l2-compliance and a 10-frame capture from each sensor still pass
after the runs. One warning in the open() run on GC5035:
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock), from
__v4l2_subdev_state_alloc() in subdev_open(). The GC5035 driver uses
its control handler's mutex as the state lock, and the open took it
after the unbind had destroyed it in v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(): that
is the lifetime limitation above, which these patches do not touch.
- syzbot has not tested the series: its report has no public
reproducer.
- I can post the test program if that helps.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20260919162709.314464-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/aqUoLr0JFGEBiJIf@kekkonen.localdomain/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/178921203630.98144.13238972861597227362@gmail.com/
Nicola Fiorillo (2):
media: v4l2-subdev: Fix NULL pointer dereference in subdev_open()
media: v4l2-subdev: Fix NULL pointer dereference in the EXT_CTRLS
ioctls
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
base-commit: 8e26d4c20ed218db6c3123480a4a4e2545680566
--
2.47.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 4:25 Nicola Fiorillo [this message]
2026-10-08 4:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] media: v4l2-subdev: Fix NULL pointer dereference in subdev_open() Nicola Fiorillo
2026-10-08 5:48 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-10-08 7:06 ` Nicola Fiorillo
2026-10-08 4:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] media: v4l2-subdev: Fix NULL pointer dereference in the EXT_CTRLS ioctls Nicola Fiorillo
2026-10-08 10:44 ` Sakari Ailus
2026-10-08 13:55 ` Nicola Fiorillo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261008042600.275884-1-nicfio@gmail.com \
--to=nicfio@gmail.com \
--cc=hverkuil@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®