From: T S Rameshkumar <rameshsv06@gmail.com>
To: Petar Sakic <petar.sakic@ink.fish>
Cc: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>,
Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mptcp: push queued data on passive TFO subflows becoming established
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 15:35:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008100520.104205-1-rameshkumar.t@phytecembedded.in> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFPPu1gU2Y-D+d4i3F0MoNkYK+e1U+=X3qf6QycjfKBw+8snPg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Petar, Matthieu, Mat,
Thanks for the feedback and confirmation!
Indeed, since the bug predates e00b63056fb4 and exists back to when server-side
Fast Open was originally introduced, the appropriate Fixes tag would be:
Fixes: fb7084501a61 ("mptcp: add support for TCP_FASTOPEN sockopt")
During our testing with simulated network latency in namespaces, we also found
that when the 3rd ACK arrives:
1. check_fully_established() marks subflow->fully_established = true.
2. But within tcp_ack(), the underlying TCP state is still TCP_SYN_RECV until
tcp_rcv_state_process() sets it to TCP_ESTABLISHED.
3. Therefore, invoking the push in subflow_state_change() ensures the subflow
is recognized as active by __tcp_can_send() and immediately flushes the
queued write buffer.
I can send a [PATCH net v2] with the updated Fixes tag once maintainers review.
Thanks,
T S Rameshkumar
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAFPPu1gU2Y-D+d4i3F0MoNkYK+e1U+=X3qf6QycjfKBw+8snPg@mail.gmail.com>
2026-10-08 10:05 ` T S Rameshkumar [this message]
2026-10-08 9:52 T S Rameshkumar
2026-10-08 9:59 ` Petar Sakic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261008100520.104205-1-rameshkumar.t@phytecembedded.in \
--to=rameshsv06@gmail.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petar.sakic@ink.fish \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®