From: T S Rameshkumar <rameshsv06@gmail.com>
To: matttbe@kernel.org, martineau@kernel.org, geliang@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, petar.sakic@ink.fish,
T S Rameshkumar <rameshkumar.t@phytecembedded.in>
Subject: [PATCH v3] mptcp: push queued data on passive TFO subflows becoming established
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 16:18:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008104840.131986-1-rameshkumar.t@phytecembedded.in> (raw)
With TCP Fast Open on an MPTCP listener, if the server application
writes data while the passive subflow is still in SYN_RECV (after
consuming the client's SYN data but before the MP_CAPABLE third ACK
arrives), __mptcp_subflow_active() refuses transmission and the data
is queued into the msk write queue.
When the MPC third ACK arrives, the subflow transitions to
TCP_ESTABLISHED and is marked fully established in
check_fully_established(), but because the third ACK carries no
DSS data, the queued bytes remain stranded until the peer sends
more data.
Fix this in check_fully_established() by checking if the subflow
was doing passive TFO (subflow->is_mptfo). Under mptcp_data_lock(),
flush queued bytes via __mptcp_check_push() and clear is_mptfo.
Reported-by: Petar Sakic <petar.sakic@ink.fish>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAFPPu1gU2Y-D+d4i3F0MoNkYK+e1U+=X3qf6QycjfKBw+8snPg@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: fb7084501a61 ("mptcp: add support for TCP_FASTOPEN sockopt")
Signed-off-by: T S Rameshkumar <rameshkumar.t@phytecembedded.in>
---
v2 -> v3:
- Move the push and is_mptfo reset directly into check_fully_established()
under mptcp_data_lock(), avoiding any potential race in subflow_state_change()
which could clear is_mptfo before check_fully_established() processes the 3rd ACK.
v1 -> v2:
- Use __mptcp_check_push() under mptcp_data_lock() instead of mptcp_push_pending().
net/mptcp/options.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
index ce0de02f5..b865ee6af 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/options.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
@@ -1042,6 +1042,15 @@ static bool check_fully_established(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk,
mptcp_data_lock((struct sock *)msk);
__mptcp_subflow_fully_established(msk, subflow, mp_opt);
+ /* Passive TFO: the application may have written data while the
+ * subflow was still in SYN_RECV; __mptcp_subflow_active() refused
+ * it then and nothing else spools the msk write queue when the
+ * MPC third ack (no DSS) arrives. Push it now.
+ */
+ if (subflow->is_mptfo) {
+ subflow->is_mptfo = 0;
+ __mptcp_check_push((struct sock *)msk, ssk);
+ }
mptcp_data_unlock((struct sock *)msk);
check_notify:
--
2.34.1
reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261008104840.131986-1-rameshkumar.t@phytecembedded.in \
--to=rameshsv06@gmail.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petar.sakic@ink.fish \
--cc=rameshkumar.t@phytecembedded.in \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®