mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kun Luo <luokun485@gmail.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Kun Luo <luokun485@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xhci: dbgtty: convert rx push tasklet to BH workqueue
Date: Thu,  8 Oct 2026 20:06:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008120605.174601-1-luokun485@gmail.com> (raw)

The kernel is converting remaining tasklet users to BH workqueues so
softirq handling can go through the workqueue path. The dbc TTY rx
push path is a straightforward bottom-half: schedule from IRQ /
unthrottle, run the same work, kill on port teardown.

Replace the tasklet with system_bh_wq. Behavior stays in softirq
context, so existing locking is unchanged.

Compile-tested only.

Signed-off-by: Kun Luo <luokun485@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.h |  2 +-
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.h
index 5b18efb2c1ea..78e9b5e674a3 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.h
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct dbc_port {
 	struct list_head		read_pool;
 	struct list_head		read_queue;
 	unsigned int			n_read;
-	struct tasklet_struct		push;
+	struct work_struct		push;
 
 	struct list_head		write_pool;
 	unsigned int			tx_boundary;
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c
index 3d51e8d82659..c18215751d92 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <linux/tty.h>
 #include <linux/tty_flip.h>
 #include <linux/idr.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
 
 #include "xhci.h"
 #include "xhci-dbgcap.h"
@@ -189,9 +190,9 @@ dbc_read_complete(struct xhci_dbc *dbc, struct dbc_request *req)
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* defer moving data from req to tty buffer to a tasklet */
+	/* defer moving data from req to tty buffer to BH workqueue */
 	list_add_tail(&req->list_pool, &port->read_queue);
-	tasklet_schedule(&port->push);
+	queue_work(system_bh_wq, &port->push);
 out:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
 }
@@ -384,7 +385,7 @@ static void dbc_tty_unthrottle(struct tty_struct *tty)
 	unsigned long		flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags);
-	tasklet_schedule(&port->push);
+	queue_work(system_bh_wq, &port->push);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -400,13 +401,13 @@ static const struct tty_operations dbc_tty_ops = {
 	.unthrottle		= dbc_tty_unthrottle,
 };
 
-static void dbc_rx_push(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+static void dbc_rx_push(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct dbc_request	*req;
 	struct tty_struct	*tty;
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	bool			disconnect = false;
-	struct dbc_port		*port = from_tasklet(port, t, push);
+	struct dbc_port		*port = from_work(port, work, push);
 	struct list_head	*queue = &port->read_queue;
 	int			untransferred;
 
@@ -438,7 +439,7 @@ static void dbc_rx_push(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 	}
 
 	if (!list_empty(queue))
-		tasklet_schedule(&port->push);
+		queue_work(system_bh_wq, &port->push);
 
 	if (!disconnect)
 		dbc_start_rx(port);
@@ -467,7 +468,7 @@ xhci_dbc_tty_init_port(struct xhci_dbc *dbc, struct dbc_port *port)
 {
 	tty_port_init(&port->port);
 	spin_lock_init(&port->port_lock);
-	tasklet_setup(&port->push, dbc_rx_push);
+	INIT_WORK(&port->push, dbc_rx_push);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&port->read_pool);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&port->read_queue);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&port->write_pool);
@@ -479,7 +480,7 @@ xhci_dbc_tty_init_port(struct xhci_dbc *dbc, struct dbc_port *port)
 static void
 xhci_dbc_tty_exit_port(struct dbc_port *port)
 {
-	tasklet_kill(&port->push);
+	cancel_work_sync(&port->push);
 	tty_port_destroy(&port->port);
 }
 
-- 
2.54.0


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-10-08 12:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261008120605.174601-1-luokun485@gmail.com \
    --to=luokun485@gmail.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®