mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: daejun7.park@samsung.com
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>,
	Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@gmail.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] xfs: clamp the pNFS layout range to the maximum file size
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 08:41:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008154119.GP2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008-xfs-nfsd-map-blocks-v1-3-560026cdccb6@samsung.com>

On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 10:39:32AM +0900, Daejun Park via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
> 
> xfs_fs_map_blocks() checks the range of a layout with
> 
> 	if (offset > limit)
> 		goto out_unlock;
> 	if (offset > limit - length)
> 		length = limit - offset;
> 
> limit - length is computed in u64, so a length larger than the limit
> wraps and the length is not clamped. nfsd passes the LAYOUTGET range
> through, and RFC 8881 lets a client ask for NFS4_UINT64_MAX bytes, for
> the rest of the file. offset + length then wraps to offset - 1, end_fsb
> rounds back to offset_fsb, and xfs_bmapi_read() maps nothing. For a read
> layout, xfs_bmbt_to_iomap() then gets an uninitialized imap: with a
> zeroed stack it logs "Access to block zero", marks the data fork sick
> and fails with -EFSCORRUPTED, and otherwise the mapping is whatever was
> on the stack and can reach the client. For a write layout,
> xfs_iomap_write_direct() is called with a count of zero, which trips an
> ASSERT with XFS_DEBUG. An offset of 2^63 or more, which nfsd accepts
> too, becomes negative in the loff_t argument and passes the first check.
> 
> Reject a negative offset and an offset at the limit, and compare the
> length with what is left up to the limit, which cannot wrap once the
> offset is below it.
> 
> With pynfs as the client, a READ LAYOUTGET for NFS4_UINT64_MAX bytes at
> offset 0 got NFS4ERR_IO, as did an RW one, which also made nfsd warn
> about the non-standard errno -63, and a READ LAYOUTGET at offset 2^63
> got NFS4ERR_IO as well. With this patch and the previous one, the one at
> 2^63 gets NFS4ERR_INVAL, the RW one gets NFS4ERR_NOSPC before anything
> is allocated, as the range up to the maximum file size cannot be
> reserved, and the server logs nothing. The READ one gets NFS4ERR_INVAL
> as well: nfsd, which maps a layout one extent at a time since
> commit cc6c40e09d7b ("NFSD/blocklayout: Support multiple extents per
> LAYOUTGET"), asks again from the maximum file size on. An RW one on a
> file whose first 64 KiB are allocated, with a loga_maxcount that has
> room for one extent, is granted 0+65536.
> 
> This depends on the previous patch. Without it, an RW LAYOUTGET to the
> end of the file, whose length is now clamped instead of wrapping, asks
> xfs_iomap_write_direct() for every block up to the maximum file size,
> which wraps the block reservation and shuts the filesystem down where it
> got NFS4ERR_IO before.
> 
> Fixes: 527851124d10 ("xfs: implement pNFS export operations")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>

Looks fine to me
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
> index ab38561700..88d9c3c043 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
> @@ -167,9 +167,9 @@ xfs_fs_map_blocks(
>  	if (!write)
>  		limit = max(limit, round_up(i_size_read(inode),
>  				     inode->i_sb->s_blocksize));
> -	if (offset > limit)
> +	if (offset < 0 || offset >= limit)
>  		goto out_unlock;
> -	if (offset > limit - length)
> +	if (length > limit - offset)
>  		length = limit - offset;
>  
>  	error = filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-08 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-08  1:39 [PATCH 0/8] xfs, nfsd: map a whole pNFS block layout in one ->map_blocks call Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-08  1:39 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: map pNFS layouts to the end of the extent again Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-08  1:39 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: refuse a direct allocation whose block reservation would wrap Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 15:40   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-08  1:39 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: clamp the pNFS layout range to the maximum file size Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 15:41   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-10-08  1:39 ` [PATCH 4/8] exportfs: let ->map_blocks return more than one mapping Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-08  1:39 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: factor the mapping of one pNFS extent out of xfs_fs_map_blocks() Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-08  1:39 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: take the invalidate lock while mapping a pNFS layout Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-08  1:39 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: map the whole range of a pNFS layout in one ->map_blocks call Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 16:37   ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-08  1:39 ` [PATCH 8/8] nfsd: get all extents of a block " Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 16:44   ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261008154119.GP2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=dgc@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=sergeybashirov@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®