mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan-Gerd Tenberge <janten@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org,
	emil@etsalapatis.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	horms@kernel.org, jakub@cloudflare.com, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev,
	kuniyu@google.com, willemb@google.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test iterator link target validation
Date: Thu,  8 Oct 2026 18:13:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008161309.8179-3-janten@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008161309.8179-1-janten@gmail.com>

Exercise target-dependent iterator checks during BPF_LINK_UPDATE.
Verify that updates to a program with an oversized array or socket-storage
value access are rejected, as is an update to a sleepable program on a
non-reschedulable hash iterator.

Run each original program after the rejected update to ensure that it
remains attached. Also verify that a compatible array iterator update
succeeds.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Jan-Gerd Tenberge <janten@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c       | 34 +++++++++++++++++--
 .../bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_array_map.c        | 17 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
index c69080ca14f5..3ae5203d3fac 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
@@ -897,14 +897,22 @@ static void test_bpf_hash_map(void)
 	/* Sleepable program is prohibited for hash map iterator */
 	linfo.map.map_fd = map_fd;
 	link = bpf_program__attach_iter(skel->progs.sleepable_dummy_dump, &opts);
-	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link, "attach_sleepable_prog_to_iter"))
+	err = libbpf_get_error(link);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "attach_sleepable_prog_to_iter")) {
+		if (!err)
+			bpf_link__destroy(link);
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	linfo.map.map_fd = map_fd;
 	link = bpf_program__attach_iter(skel->progs.dump_bpf_hash_map, &opts);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_iter"))
 		goto out;
 
+	err = bpf_link__update_program(link, skel->progs.sleepable_dummy_dump);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "update_sleepable_prog"))
+		goto free_link;
+
 	iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
 	if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "create_iter"))
 		goto free_link;
@@ -1023,7 +1031,7 @@ static void test_bpf_array_map(void)
 	int err, i, map_fd, hash_fd, iter_fd;
 	struct bpf_iter_bpf_array_map *skel;
 	union bpf_iter_link_info linfo;
-	struct bpf_link *link;
+	struct bpf_link *link, *bad_link;
 	char buf[64] = {};
 	int len, start;
 
@@ -1049,10 +1057,24 @@ static void test_bpf_array_map(void)
 	linfo.map.map_fd = map_fd;
 	opts.link_info = &linfo;
 	opts.link_info_len = sizeof(linfo);
+	bad_link = bpf_program__attach_iter(skel->progs.oob_write_bpf_array_map,
+					    &opts);
+	err = libbpf_get_error(bad_link);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -EACCES, "attach_oob_write_iter")) {
+		if (!err)
+			bpf_link__destroy(bad_link);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	link = bpf_program__attach_iter(skel->progs.dump_bpf_array_map, &opts);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_iter"))
 		goto out;
 
+	err = bpf_link__update_program(link, skel->progs.oob_write_bpf_array_map);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -EACCES, "update_oob_write_iter"))
+		goto free_link;
+
+	/* The rejected update must leave dump_bpf_array_map attached. */
 	iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
 	if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "create_iter"))
 		goto free_link;
@@ -1092,6 +1114,9 @@ static void test_bpf_array_map(void)
 			goto close_iter;
 	}
 
+	err = bpf_link__update_program(link, skel->progs.noop_bpf_array_map);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "update_valid_iter");
+
 close_iter:
 	close(iter_fd);
 free_link:
@@ -1363,6 +1388,11 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_map(void)
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_iter"))
 		goto out;
 
+	err = bpf_link__update_program(link,
+				       skel->progs.oob_write_bpf_sk_storage_map);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -EACCES, "update_oob_write_iter"))
+		goto free_link;
+
 	iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
 	if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "create_iter"))
 		goto free_link;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_array_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_array_map.c
index 19710cc0f250..beb1b714f120 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_array_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_bpf_array_map.c
@@ -51,3 +51,20 @@ int dump_bpf_array_map(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem *ctx)
 	*val = *key;
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("iter/bpf_map_elem")
+int noop_bpf_array_map(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("iter/bpf_map_elem")
+int oob_write_bpf_array_map(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem *ctx)
+{
+	__u64 *val = ctx->value;
+
+	if (val)
+		val[1] = 0;
+
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.54.0 (Apple Git-157)


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-08 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-08 16:13 [PATCH bpf 0/2] bpf: Fix iterator link update " Jan-Gerd Tenberge
2026-10-08 16:13 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: Revalidate iterator programs on link update Jan-Gerd Tenberge
2026-10-08 17:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-08 16:13 ` Jan-Gerd Tenberge [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261008161309.8179-3-janten@gmail.com \
    --to=janten@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®