mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	 Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
	 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] selftests: drv-net: psp: factor out psp connection setup
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 13:46:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009-psp-v2-5-5596ab50f677@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009-psp-v2-0-5596ab50f677@gmail.com>

Lift out connection setup and PSP assoc uapi code in psp.py and
responder, so that the key exchange sequence can be used in other test
cases that start with a key exchange, but might choose to perform
additional tx/rx assoc calls afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py         | 14 +++-
 .../testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp_responder.c  | 87 +++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
index 473500901879..71eeade62ad2 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
@@ -447,10 +447,11 @@ def assoc_twice(cfg):
             ksft_eq(len(tx), 0)
 
 
-def _data_basic_send(cfg, version, ipver):
-    """ Test basic data send """
-    _init_psp_dev(cfg)
+def _establish_psp_conn(cfg, version, ipver=None):
+    """Establish a PSP connection and return after key exchange
 
+    Requires _init_psp_dev() to have been called first.
+    """
     # Version 0 is required by spec, don't let it skip
     if version:
         name = cfg.pspnl.consts["version"].entries_by_val[version].name
@@ -475,7 +476,14 @@ def _data_basic_send(cfg, version, ipver):
                         "version": version,
                         "tx-key": tx,
                         "sock-fd": s.fileno()})
+    return s
+
+
+def _data_basic_send(cfg, version, ipver):
+    """ Test basic data send """
+    _init_psp_dev(cfg)
 
+    s = _establish_psp_conn(cfg, version, ipver)
     data_len = _send_careful(cfg, s, 100)
     _check_data_rx(cfg, data_len)
     _close_psp_conn(cfg, s)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp_responder.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp_responder.c
index a26e7628bbb1..57425ecb9561 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp_responder.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp_responder.c
@@ -37,20 +37,24 @@ static struct {
 	unsigned char rx;
 } psp_vers;
 
-static int conn_setup_psp(struct ynl_sock *ys, struct opts *opts, int data_sock)
+static unsigned int psp_key_len(unsigned char version)
 {
+	switch (version) {
+	case PSP_VERSION_HDR0_AES_GCM_256:
+	case PSP_VERSION_HDR0_AES_GMAC_256:
+		return 32;
+	default:
+		return 16;
+	}
+}
+
+static int
+rx_assoc(struct ynl_sock *ys, __u32 *spi, char *key, int data_sock)
+{
+	unsigned int key_len = psp_key_len(psp_vers.rx);
 	struct psp_rx_assoc_rsp *rsp;
 	struct psp_rx_assoc_req *req;
-	struct psp_tx_assoc_rsp *tsp;
-	struct psp_tx_assoc_req *teq;
-	char info[300];
-	int key_len;
-	ssize_t sz;
-	__u32 spi;
 
-	dbg("create PSP connection\n");
-
-	// Rx assoc alloc
 	req = psp_rx_assoc_req_alloc();
 
 	psp_rx_assoc_req_set_sock_fd(req, data_sock);
@@ -64,29 +68,34 @@ static int conn_setup_psp(struct ynl_sock *ys, struct opts *opts, int data_sock)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	// SPI exchange
-	key_len = rsp->rx_key._len.key;
-	memcpy(info, &rsp->rx_key.spi, sizeof(spi));
-	memcpy(&info[sizeof(spi)], rsp->rx_key.key, key_len);
-	sz = sizeof(spi) + key_len;
+	if (rsp->rx_key._len.key != key_len) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: unexpected Rx key length %u\n",
+			rsp->rx_key._len.key);
+		psp_rx_assoc_rsp_free(rsp);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	memcpy(spi, &rsp->rx_key.spi, sizeof(*spi));
+	memcpy(key, rsp->rx_key.key, key_len);
 
-	send(data_sock, info, sz, MSG_WAITALL);
 	psp_rx_assoc_rsp_free(rsp);
 
-	sz = recv(data_sock, info, sz, MSG_WAITALL);
-	if (sz < 0) {
-		perror("ERROR: failed to read PSP key from sock");
-		return -1;
-	}
-	memcpy(&spi, info, sizeof(spi));
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+tx_assoc(struct ynl_sock *ys, __u8 version, __u32 spi, char *key,
+	 int data_sock)
+{
+	struct psp_tx_assoc_rsp *tsp;
+	struct psp_tx_assoc_req *teq;
 
-	// Setup Tx assoc
 	teq = psp_tx_assoc_req_alloc();
 
 	psp_tx_assoc_req_set_sock_fd(teq, data_sock);
-	psp_tx_assoc_req_set_version(teq, psp_vers.tx);
+	psp_tx_assoc_req_set_version(teq, version);
 	psp_tx_assoc_req_set_tx_key_spi(teq, spi);
-	psp_tx_assoc_req_set_tx_key_key(teq, &info[sizeof(spi)], key_len);
+	psp_tx_assoc_req_set_tx_key_key(teq, key, psp_key_len(version));
 
 	tsp = psp_tx_assoc(ys, teq);
 	psp_tx_assoc_req_free(teq);
@@ -99,6 +108,34 @@ static int conn_setup_psp(struct ynl_sock *ys, struct opts *opts, int data_sock)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int conn_setup_psp(struct ynl_sock *ys, struct opts *opts, int data_sock)
+{
+	unsigned int key_len = psp_key_len(psp_vers.rx);
+	char info[300];
+	ssize_t sz;
+	__u32 spi;
+
+	dbg("create PSP connection\n");
+
+	if (rx_assoc(ys, &spi, &info[sizeof(spi)], data_sock))
+		return -1;
+
+	// SPI exchange
+	memcpy(info, &spi, sizeof(spi));
+	sz = sizeof(spi) + key_len;
+
+	send(data_sock, info, sz, MSG_WAITALL);
+
+	sz = recv(data_sock, info, sz, MSG_WAITALL);
+	if (sz < 0) {
+		perror("ERROR: failed to read PSP key from sock");
+		return -1;
+	}
+	memcpy(&spi, info, sizeof(spi));
+
+	return tx_assoc(ys, psp_vers.tx, spi, &info[sizeof(spi)], data_sock);
+}
+
 static void send_ack(int sock)
 {
 	send(sock, "ack", 4, MSG_WAITALL);

-- 
2.52.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09 20:46 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] psp: support rekeying psp protected tcp connections Daniel Zahka
2026-10-09 20:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] psp: support rx rekey operation Daniel Zahka
2026-10-09 20:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] psp: support tx " Daniel Zahka
2026-10-09 20:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] psp: defer tx key deletions for SADB drivers Daniel Zahka
2026-10-09 20:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] psp: add core tracked stat for outstanding tx keys Daniel Zahka
2026-10-09 20:46 ` Daniel Zahka [this message]
2026-10-09 20:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] selftests: drv-net: psp: add rekey tests Daniel Zahka
2026-10-09 20:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/7] selftests: drv-net: psp: add a tx rekey drain test for SADB drivers Daniel Zahka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261009-psp-v2-5-5596ab50f677@gmail.com \
    --to=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®