From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B1B13F1047; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 22:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791584897; cv=none; b=XHpKRGD/nSFWp6eMGy21xMmBFwrjlsc7+1J8Y8jya/1wcCB/fMpkDSb/OPechZ36dIG/llLI/e4vNTFe2yh4K7Ucsbzk+geDCSOC/Ymqt+bpSET7FofnaniedIQVx+fagcWekY8oDzKdQ2VXYGcjHhz9hAguJ1OpQMcWY/awAwQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791584897; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iAGcTpDba2RVZqCOk4JN/TRjNiwaJuaBu2WoY8euR4w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=B/Kfbgz0DceQJeRKz243tkdriCttNlx7z89ol92Ti8Iz1Ri1nY3RJgbPj0ngx88UkOxk/fI1K3ABgVawDrNoDYmv577ByisqZIj1Vjd0Rxu6516N/R1T3e655AwTUA7gqmr/RnDm4tr9+9H80h1p6Tx98geqplWXMmeiCYQdy24= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=T7QbtMlY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="T7QbtMlY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10F951F000FF; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 22:28:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1791584895; bh=KG05p9dAhQpWYY9sGgGIohuferLJAQB7IQyWVE4eJGs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=T7QbtMlYgsS+p6X2IpyFdJUb1UAICbcDtnYNZyNEc/igCVpBPGx2F5TOVllAZFizR /54eOXOpUBmX0lnRAvRosdbUyn5x78i1C7tE8XNQy5kcb3IMsd27qSWQCroI+7Bfq1 aavvQJrUWmCRj0ZqAd3e0UWMhuFjQnQiB60Tu/BA= Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 18:28:13 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Sasha Levin , workflows@vger.kernel.org, ksummit@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, broonie@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] agents: add infrastructure for agent resources Message-ID: <20261009-vivid-celadon-pigeon-bbddec@lemur> References: <5dfafd6f79165526fe17774c55b553b7dfe4b3fe.1791499378.git.sashal@kernel.org> <20261009134025.GA11438@unreal> <20261009-nebulous-prophetic-caiman-c7842c@lemur> <20261009163617.GB11438@unreal> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261009163617.GB11438@unreal> On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 07:36:17PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > Hm... What do you think Konstantin? > > > > > > I remember the workflows@ list was originally created to share our > > > secret/magical workflows, and I'm not sure that this one qualifies. We can > > > start a new list too if it's easier. > > > > Eh. At this point I'm trying to shove everyone towards "just use dfn: queries > > for your stuff, stop relying on actual 'lists'". I'd just leave it as > > linux-kernel@vger, honestly, since the automated patch churn may annoy those > > people on the workflows list that we actually want to keep there. > > Konstantin, > > The "Documentation Process" entry already points to the workflow@ mailing list. > Changes proposed in "AGENT RESOURCES" will affect everyone, so sending such > important patches to LKML (/dev/null) does not seem right to me. Ah, sorry, I hadn't actually realized that it already has F: entries in MAINTAINERS. Then my observation is really moot and if you think workflows makes more sense, especially with linux-kernel being a firehose where everyone is just going to miss any patches, then let's use workflows@. -K