From: Shirong Zhao <shxzhaosr@163.com>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com>,
Dongdong Hao <doubled@leap-io-kernel.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com>,
Ranjan Kumar <ranjan.kumar@broadcom.com>,
MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com,
mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] scsi: check set_identify result in update_links
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 18:23:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009102313.18-1-shxzhaosr@163.com> (raw)
update_links() in mpt3sas, mpi3mr and leapraid all ignore the return
value of their set_identify helper. On firmware query failure the
identify struct is left untouched, and the phy is then attached using
a stale sas_address from before the failed query.
This series fixes all three the same way: fold the call into the if
condition so a failed query takes the existing zeroing else path, the
same "no valid identify" state as an invalid handle or link rate.
The next successful link event re-fills the identify.
All three were verified against scsi.git fixes (469fa055664b): each
applies cleanly, passes checkpatch --strict with no warnings, and
its transport object builds warning-free before and after the change.
Shirong Zhao (3):
scsi: mpt3sas: check set_identify result in update_links
scsi: mpi3mr: check set_identify result in update_links
scsi: leapraid: check set_identify result in update_links
drivers/scsi/leapraid/leapraid_transport.c | 6 +++---
drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c | 6 +++---
drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_transport.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 10:23 Shirong Zhao [this message]
2026-10-09 10:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi: mpt3sas: " Shirong Zhao
2026-10-09 10:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: mpi3mr: " Shirong Zhao
2026-10-09 10:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: leapraid: " Shirong Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261009102313.18-1-shxzhaosr@163.com \
--to=shxzhaosr@163.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=doubled@leap-io-kernel.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=ranjan.kumar@broadcom.com \
--cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
--cc=sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com \
--cc=suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com \
--cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®