mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Zack Rusin" <zack.rusin@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Mastro <amastro@fb.com>, Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] dma-buf: dmabuf->file release-time cleanup
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 2026 13:35:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009123601.94079-1-matt@ozlabs.org> (raw)

Hi all,

A fix for DMABUF's file-release path, to set dmabuf->file = NULL when
the struct file itself is being freed and avoid a stale pointer
lingering.  Previously it could be assumed that dmabuf->file was
always valid until .release was called, but commit 4ab59c3c638c6
("dma-buf: Move dma_buf_release() from fops to dentry_ops") separated
dentry release (calls .release) from file release (can happen before
.release).  Setting the pointer to NULL clearly delimits the period in
which it points to a valid struct file.

Raw dmabuf->file access is bad news unless the file is known to have a
reference held (for example, during export).  A single-threaded
problem scenario is a dentry held open (e.g. using O_PATH) but the
file closed; .release is not called, so the exporter was unaware that
dmabuf->file became stale.  Exporter activities using dmabuf->file
then led to a UAF.  Or, threads racing concurrent access with a file
closing.

VFIO uses get_file_active(&dmabuf->file), which is a UAF when the
pointer goes stale.  Alex Mastro has created a VFIO-centric reproducer
[1], which shows up with KASAN.

To fix, dmabuf->file is either valid or NULL.  get_file_active() is
then safe and a recommended way to access dmabuf->file without an
existing reference.  The only possible outcomes are for it to get a
reference to the file, to observe a valid pointer but the file in the
DEAD state (being closed, fail), or NULL (fail).

Patch [2/2] sets the pointer NULL when the file closes, which
get_file_active() handles correctly.

vmwgfx was identified as doing a problematic dmabuf->file dereference.
Although already a UAF, making dmabuf->file = NULL turns it into an
oops.  So, the paired patch [1/2] correspondingly converts vmwgfx to
use get_file_active() too.

Added comments to highlight that dmabuf->file could go away before
.release, and to use get_file_active() if a reference isn't otherwise
already held.


Thanks,

Matt

[1]: https://github.com/opsound/vfio-dmabuf-lab/blob/main/tests/vfio_dmabuf_opath_uaf_test.c

"v1" was the single "dma-buf: Annul dmabuf->file on file release"
patch:

 https://lore.kernel.org/all/f8efaabd-c06e-4f04-8cfa-489c148e37ba@ozlabs.org/

Matt Evans (2):
  drm/vmwgfx: Use get_file_active() for dmabuf->file
  dma-buf: Annul dmabuf->file on file release

 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c           | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/ttm_object.c |  2 +-
 include/linux/dma-buf.h             |  4 +++-
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.3


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09 12:35 Matt Evans [this message]
2026-10-09 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/vmwgfx: Use get_file_active() for dmabuf->file Matt Evans
2026-10-09 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dma-buf: Annul dmabuf->file on file release Matt Evans
2026-10-09 12:55   ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261009123601.94079-1-matt@ozlabs.org \
    --to=matt@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=amastro@fb.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=zack.rusin@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®