From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CLANG/LLVM BUILD SUPPORT:Keyword:b(?i:clang|llvm)b"
<llvm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Define p4d_page() instead of stubbing it to NULL
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 21:13:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009191300.GA757048@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008191711.223236-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 12:17:11PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> A sparc64 allmodconfig build with LLVM fails in vmalloc_to_page():
>
> mm/vmalloc.c: error: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer
> has undefined behavior [-Werror,-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>
> sparc64 defines p4d_page() as NULL, on the assumption that it is only
> used by stubbed out hugetlb gup code. Generic code now uses it in
> vmalloc_to_page(), ptdump and KASAN. In vmalloc_to_page() the NULL is
> used in pointer arithmetic, which clang diagnoses even though the
> branch is unreachable on sparc64.
>
> Define p4d_page() as a NULL function to silence clang's warning on an
> unreachable branch. sparc64 has no p4d leaf mappings, so there is no
> functional change.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: use a NULL function instead.
> arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> index 35a217bf6e5c..54e563eb0efd 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static inline pmd_t *pud_pgtable(pud_t pud)
> #define p4d_clear(p4dp) (p4d_val(*(p4dp)) = 0UL)
>
> /* only used by the stubbed out hugetlb gup code, should never be called */
> -#define p4d_page(p4d) NULL
> +#define p4d_page(p4d) static inline struct page *p4d_page(p4d_t p4d) { return NULL; }
Huh? Why did you keep the macro instead of replacing it with the static
inline function wholesale? This should have just be
-#define p4d_page(p4d) NULL
+static inline struct page *p4d_page(p4d_t p4d) { return NULL; }
no?
> #define pud_leaf pud_leaf
> static inline bool pud_leaf(pud_t pud)
> --
> 2.56.0
>
--
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 19:17 Rosen Penev
2026-10-09 19:13 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2026-10-09 21:33 ` Rosen Penev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261009191300.GA757048@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®