From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
KBuild Mailing List <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the efi tree with the kbuild tree
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 22:52:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009215215.GA981232@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aslflbcgByI1rH2_@sirena.co.uk>
On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 11:41:41PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the efi tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
>
> between commit:
>
> 454e00cf8ee5a ("kbuild: avoid re-running compiler and linker probes")
>
> from the kbuild tree and commit:
>
> aa712d73350dc ("efi/libstub: Disable kernel stack erasing in the common flags")
>
> from the efi tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> index 415f63105b481,7bb5e5066c732..0000000000000
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> @@@ -40,7 -40,8 +40,8 @@@ KBUILD_CFLAGS := $(subst $(CC_FLAGS_F
> -D__NO_FORTIFY \
> -ffreestanding \
> -fno-stack-protector \
> + $(CONFIG_CC_OPT_NO_ADDRSIG) \
> + $(DISABLE_KSTACK_ERASE) \
> - $(call cc-option,-fno-addrsig) \
> -D__DISABLE_EXPORTS
>
> #
Thanks, looks good to me.
--
Cheers,
Nathan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 21:41 Mark Brown
2026-10-09 21:52 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261009215215.GA981232@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®