From: Alexander Gruhlke <gruhlke@mailbox.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
regressions@lists.linux.dev,
Alexander Gruhlke <gruhlke@mailbox.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] PCI: Wait after FLR for devices that don't honor Immediate Readiness
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 18:05:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261010160529.27974-1-gruhlke@mailbox.org> (raw)
Since v7.2, VFIO passthrough of a Samsung 990 PRO NVMe [144d:a80c] fails
on the second VM start (QEMU: "invalid PCI interrupt pin 255"), and the
device is inaccessible until reboot. Reverting 10baa9b4df40 ("PCI: Drop
unnecessary retries when restoring BARs") fixes it.
The drive advertises Immediate Readiness, so pcie_flr() doesn't wait,
but it returns ~0 for 1-7 ms after every FLR. The config restore is
lost, and vfio-pci then saves and later restores an all-ones config
space. The Root Port has RRS Software Visibility enabled, and the drive
returns ~0 rather than RRS, so pci_dev_wait() wouldn't catch it either.
That is the same problem as the open d591f6804e7e regression with the
Intel [8086:0a54], hence patch 1.
Tested on v7.2.9 (Ryzen 9 7950X, X670E): with the series, three VM
starts in a row work and pci_dev_wait() reports "ready 1ms" to "ready
7ms after FLR". Applies to pci/next.
Another user reports the same with a 990 EVO Plus [144d:a80d]:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=314833
#regzbot introduced: 10baa9b4df40
Alexander Gruhlke (2):
PCI: Don't treat ~0 as ready in pci_dev_wait() with RRS SV
PCI: Wait for readiness after FLR even with Immediate Readiness
drivers/pci/pci.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
2.56.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-10 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 16:05 Alexander Gruhlke [this message]
2026-10-10 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Don't treat ~0 as ready in pci_dev_wait() with RRS SV Alexander Gruhlke
2026-10-10 18:36 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-10-11 8:24 ` Alexander Gruhlke
2026-10-11 15:14 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-10-10 16:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Wait for readiness after FLR even with Immediate Readiness Alexander Gruhlke
2026-10-10 17:51 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-10-11 8:25 ` Alexander Gruhlke
2026-10-11 16:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] PCI: Wait after FLR for devices that don't honor " Alexander Gruhlke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261010160529.27974-1-gruhlke@mailbox.org \
--to=gruhlke@mailbox.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®