From: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>,
Alexandru Hossu <hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: target: iscsi: Use crypto library API
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 23:36:00 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261011233600.5bb5d6c9.ddiss@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001044857.169487-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
This looks like a worthwhile clean-up and doesn't trigger any libiscsi
chap test regressions.
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
I do have one minor concern:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:48:57 -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Make iscsi_target_auth.c call into the crypto library directly instead
> of going through crypto_shash. This is simpler and much more efficient,
> as it avoids overhead of the crypto_shash layer. The hash computation
> itself also no longer has error codes that need to be checked.
>
> For simplicity, still do a memory allocation per operation to buffer the
> data (which is typically less than 50 bytes here) so that the one-shot
> digest functions can be used. It's still much more efficient than doing
> the super slow crypto_alloc_shash().
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/target/iscsi/Kconfig | 7 +-
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_auth.c | 192 +++++++++--------------
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_auth.h | 8 +-
> 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
...
> @@ -113,17 +143,17 @@ static int chap_check_algorithm(const char *a_str)
> if (kstrtol(token, 10, &digest_type))
> continue;
>
> - digest_name = chap_get_digest_name(digest_type);
> - if (!digest_name)
> + if (fips_enabled && digest_type == CHAP_DIGEST_MD5)
> continue;
Could e.g. SHA1 also require fips filtering here in future? If so, would
it make sense to track the fips compat status (preferably at build time)
in chap_digest_algs?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 4:48 Eric Biggers
2026-10-11 12:36 ` David Disseldorp [this message]
2026-10-11 19:12 ` Eric Biggers
2026-10-12 1:46 ` David Disseldorp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261011233600.5bb5d6c9.ddiss@suse.de \
--to=ddiss@suse.de \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=hossu.alexandru@gmail.com \
--cc=lduncan@suse.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®