mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>,
	Alexandru Hossu <hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: target: iscsi: Use crypto library API
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 23:36:00 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261011233600.5bb5d6c9.ddiss@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001044857.169487-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

This looks like a worthwhile clean-up and doesn't trigger any libiscsi
chap test regressions.
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>

I do have one minor concern: 

On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:48:57 -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:

> Make iscsi_target_auth.c call into the crypto library directly instead
> of going through crypto_shash.  This is simpler and much more efficient,
> as it avoids overhead of the crypto_shash layer.  The hash computation
> itself also no longer has error codes that need to be checked.
> 
> For simplicity, still do a memory allocation per operation to buffer the
> data (which is typically less than 50 bytes here) so that the one-shot
> digest functions can be used.  It's still much more efficient than doing
> the super slow crypto_alloc_shash().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/target/iscsi/Kconfig             |   7 +-
>  drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_auth.c | 192 +++++++++--------------
>  drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_auth.h |   8 +-
>  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
...
> @@ -113,17 +143,17 @@ static int chap_check_algorithm(const char *a_str)
>  		if (kstrtol(token, 10, &digest_type))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		digest_name = chap_get_digest_name(digest_type);
> -		if (!digest_name)
> +		if (fips_enabled && digest_type == CHAP_DIGEST_MD5)
>  			continue;

Could e.g. SHA1 also require fips filtering here in future? If so, would
it make sense to track the fips compat status (preferably at build time)
in chap_digest_algs?


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-11 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01  4:48 Eric Biggers
2026-10-11 12:36 ` David Disseldorp [this message]
2026-10-11 19:12   ` Eric Biggers
2026-10-12  1:46     ` David Disseldorp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261011233600.5bb5d6c9.ddiss@suse.de \
    --to=ddiss@suse.de \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=hossu.alexandru@gmail.com \
    --cc=lduncan@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkp@kernel.org \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®